Jew Suss, the Notorious Nazi Propaganda Film

Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels, 1940
Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels, 1940

On 8 September 1940, a new German movie premiered in Europe.  Jew Suss [Jud Süss/Jud Süß] was an infamous, anti-Semitic, Nazi propaganda movie. Produced by Joseph Goebbels in 1940 Germany, it hastened the Nazi genocide against European Jews. The movie was a box office success, earning 6.5 million Reichsmarks and an audience of over 20 million.   Jud Süss was a star-studded, historical melodrama whose secret goal was inciting anti-Jewish fear and hatred amongst the German people. It worked all too well. During World War II, Heinrich Himmler required his SS officers to view it. [Remarkably, there was a pro-Jewish British version made a few years earlier.]  The Allied Military Occupation banned the German Jud Süss movie after the war in 1945 and ordered all negatives destroyed.  What was it about and why was it so reviled?

Jud Süss was a person, Josef Oppenheimer, an 18th century German Jew.  Born in Heidelberg in 1698, he became the “Court Jew,” chief financial adviser, to Karl Alexander, Duke of Württemberg. Jud Süss was his nickname, German for ‘sweet Jew.’  He was a prominent figure in Stuttgart at a time when anti-Semitism was rampant across Europe. His rise to power, controlling taxes and fees, caused both resentment and hostility among the courtiers, officials, and citizens. They were also unhappy that he enabled other Jews to move to Stuttgart, despite laws forbidding them. His lavish lifestyle did not help matters either.

Duke Karl died suddenly in 1737.  Oppenheimer was soon arrested and accused of various schemes, embezzlement, fraud and treason. He was put on trial and convicted.  Stuttgart judges could find no evidence however that he had broken any laws. So judges convicted him on a old statute where it was illegal for Jews to have sexual relations with non-Jewish women. Jud Süss had numerous, well-known affairs and was sentenced to death.

Authorities offered Oppenheimer the chance to convert to Christianity before being hanged.  He refused, responding, “I will die as a Jew, suffering violence and injustice.” His 1738 execution was staged as a public spectacle in Stuttgart. Guards placed him in a cage, hauled to the top of the gallows. There, thirty-five feet above the town square, he was hanged while praying the Shema.  His body was left up there in the cage, for six years, as a warning to other Jews. Oppenheimer was seen as a dangerous traitor by Germans.

His life was the subject of several books and not just one, but two, movies. Two hundred years later, his story was manipulated to serve two different purposes – the first by the British, the second by the Germans.  Six years before the German Jud Süss movie, came a British film, Jew Suss, made in 1934.  Jew Suss was adapted from a 1925 novel by German-Jewish writer Lion Feuchtwanger. The historical movie tells a slightly fictionalized version of Josef Oppenheimer’s story.

In the British production, Jew Suss was played by a German actor Conrad Veidt, best known as Heinrich Strasser, the Nazi major in Casablanca (1942). In the British version, Jew Suss navigates Stuttgart politics with smooth-talking self-assurance, allowing him to climb the social ladder and grab power.  The movie portrays his arrest and execution poignantly due to his refusal to disavow his Jewish heritage. He asserts his dignity, and defiantly cries a Jewish prayer as he is hanged.

This British version boasted a budget of 100,000 pounds, with a large supporting cast and elaborate sets. However, the picture was a box-office flop.  It enjoyed a wide release in Britain and the U.S., but was banned in Germany and Austria for its pro-semitic tone. The British film was a veiled petition on behalf of the victimized Jewish population of Nazi Germany. At the time, the persecution of Jews in Europe was well known, thanks to the SS St. Louis incident. But what about the contemptable German version?

Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party had hoped that 1938’s Kristallnacht (Night of Broken Glass) would produce a surge of anti-Semitism throughout Germany.  SA and SS henchmen destroyed Jewish homes, businesses and synagogues. Many Germans had Jewish friends or neighbors and found it difficult to embrace the Nazi-fueled hatred for the Jewish race. German citizens had already been bombarded with anti-Semitic propaganda for years both by newspapers and radio. However, Dr. Joseph Goebbels, Reich Minister of Enlightenment and Propaganda since 1933, was not convinced this had changed the hearts of the people.

Goebbels believed films would ultimately make Germans accept the Nazi’s solution to the “Jewish problem.”  The triumph of his vision was their version of Jud Süss. In this movie, the Nazi’s anti-Semitism was not blatantly in your face.  It was placed instead insidiously and subtly inside an engaging historical drama. With quality production values and a well-known cast of actors, Jud Süss engaged the audience on an emotional level.  Goebbels knew it would finally change Germans’ minds about their Jewish neighbors.

The German movie was based on a different 1827 novel by Wilhelm Hauff. This Goebbels remake of the British film stressed the Nazi stereotypes of Jews as crafty, untrustworthy villains.  Jud Süss was directed by well-known German director Veit Harlan.  In this movie, Jud Süss is played flamboyantly by actor Ferdinand Marian as a seductive scoundrel, rather than a victim.  He undermines political methods and subverts law and order. Worst of all, he unabashedly satisfies his sexual appetites by raping a Christian girl and having her fiancé tortured. 

Movie poster for Jud Süss, 1940 Berlin, Germany
Movie poster for Jud Süss, 1940, Berlin, Germany

The lead actor, Ferdinand Marian, was forced into playing the role of Süss. Goebbels warned him he would destroy his career if he refused.  In the Nazi version, Jud Süss opens in 1733 with Oppenheimer providing the new duke with lavish presents, that entangle Karl in an expensive, extravagant lifestyle. Oppenheimer begins granting the duke large loans to finance pet projects. As the duke does not have the treasury to repay the loans, Oppenheimer demands to serve as Finance Minister to collect his due via taxes, duties, and tolls on the people. He places his Jewish cronies in positions of power as tax collectors, causing suffering amongst the Germans.

In the German film, Oppenheimer also convinces the duke to open the city to Jews, and they arrive by the thousands. Süss lusts after the beautiful daughter, Dorothea, of the chief minister, but she rebuffs his advances. He orders her abduction and arrests her fiancé. As the fiancé is tortured in the dungeon, Süss brutally rapes the girl. Burdened with shame and grief, Dorothea commits suicide. Süss is arrested by rioters and condemned at trial to death. He is hauled to the top of the gallows and hanged in the presence of an angry mob of Germans.

At the end of the German movie, the Duke Karl’s final address to the people drives the Nazi’s propaganda message home: “May our descendants hold firmly to this law, so they can save themselves much sorrow … and save the lives and blood of their children and their children’s children.” The duke then orders all the Jews to be expelled from Wurttemberg.

The German film portrays Süss’s execution as a just and poetic ending of an evil, despised Jew. It is followed (before the credits) by a Nazi declaration, warning Germans about the perils of allowing Jews into their midst. The German movie was blatant, anti-Semitic agitation.  It builds on the repeated Nazi propaganda message that Jews are ‘sub-human vermin’ with a talent for disguising themselves as Aryan Germans.

Suss’s loans to the duke were both for his own self-glory AND the opportunity to allow more Jews into the city.  Nazi propaganda depicted Jews as insidiously disguising and inserting themselves as part of a deep conspiracy to gain power and wealth for the Jewish community.  After seeing the film’s final cut, Goebbels wrote in his diary: “An anti-Semitic film of the kind we could only wish for. I am quite happy about it.”

Goebbels opened the film simultaneously in 80 Berlin cinemas to great fanfare. Jud Süss became a hit.  It was viewed by 20 million Germans owing to Goebbels’s propaganda blitz and director Harlan’s reputation.  A Nazi Party press release issued at the time of the movie’s premier stated, “It is the duty of all to point out that every Jew has only his well-being and that of his brothers in mind, even when he pretends generous motives.”

Jud Süss was a success across Europe as well, where it sparked anti-Jewish violence in France, Italy, and elsewhere. Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler had it shown to all of his elite SS troops AND the Hitler Youth.  In the movie, Suss’s crimes included “blackmail, profiteering, indecency, and high treason.” But only one mattered most, a Jew having sex with a Christian. The Nuremberg Law of 1935 banned sex between Jews and Aryans.

The Nazi film documented that laws excluding Jews had been the norm over Germany’s long history. The film prompted street demonstrations in Berlin with crowds shouting “Throw the Jews out of Germany!”  As the war progressed, the film was shown to SS Einsatzgruppen units in the Holocaust Death Camps, to “boost morale” and affirm the Nazi Final Solution.

Goebbels propaganda was successful and Hitler was pleased.  The Nazi anti-Semitism message offered to the German people was now affirmed. Fear and hatred of Jews in German was now acceptable. The movie offered a solution to the German Jewish problem as well—deporting and ‘relocating’ Jews.  Of course, during Hitler’s Third Reich, deporting the Jews meant eventual genocide in Nazi death camps. But once the idea of deporting Jews was accepted by Germans, what eventually became of them was out of sight – out of mind.


At the end of World War II, the liberation of the Nazi Death Camps allowed a horrified world to witness what had happened to those deported Jews.  A public outcry, organized by groups of Nazi victims, led prosecutors to press charges against the movie’s director Harlan for “crimes against humanity.” Victims of Nazi persecution testified to the effects of the anti-Semitic propaganda film. They stated that Jud Süss had spread fear and terror amongst Jews, and fuel hatred and violence against them. The trial ended with Harlan’s acquittal. Veit Harlan may have escaped criminal liability, but he did not escape guilt. While Jud Süss did not directly cause the Jewish Holocaust, it certainly had a role as a catalyst.

As the Russian Army stormed into Berlin, Adolf Hitler trapped in his bunker under the Reich Chancellery.  He shot himself in the head on 30 April 1945. Joseph Goebbels, architect of years of vile Nazi propaganda, was at Hitler’s side, always the loyal sycophant, along with his wife and children.  On May 1st, Goebbels murdered each of his six children (five daughters and one son) with cyanide capsules.  Then he and his wife went outside the bunker and took capsules of their own.  Soldiers doused their bodies with petrol and set them aflame.

The Nazi threat was finally dead … for now.

Click BOOKS for more by historical writer Paul Andrews
Home » Blog

Mad King Ludwig and Neuschwanstein Castle

‘Mad’ King Ludwig II of Bavaria, 1875

‘Mad’ King Ludwig II of Bavaria was responsible for building some of the most impressive castles and palaces in all of Europe. Known as the “Fairytale King”, his Herrenchiemsee, Linderhof, and especially Neuschwanstein attract millions of visitors a year. His castles represent an operatic fantasy world built to escape from reality, which was ultimately his downfall.  Ludwig took refuge in his fantasies, got into mounting debt, and was eventually ruled insane. “I want to remain an eternal mystery to myself and others,, Ludwig once said.

The Fairytale King’s fate is also surrounded in mystery.  Was ‘Mad’ King Ludwig actually mad – or just merely an eccentric introvert? Did he in fact commit suicide by drowning at only 40, or was he murdered by royal ministers?  Why was he so obsessed with Medieval fantasy and fairytales?

The heir to the throne of the Bavarian Crown was born 25 August 1845. His parents were Prince Maximilian II of Bavaria and Crown Princess Marie of Prussia.  101 cannon shots announced the good news of his birth to the city of Munich. Princess Marie had suffered several miscarriage years earlier. 

Ludwig and his younger brother Otto were brought up with a strict emphasis on royal duty. Ludwig grew up an introverted loner, left to live within his own imagination. He grew up at Hohenschwangau Castle in southern Bavaria – a mock-Medieval castle built by his father, complete with crenelated towers.  It gave birth to the boy’s obsession with Medieval legends and fairytale.

“Ludwig enjoyed dressing up … took pleasure in play acting, loved pictures … and liked making presents of his property, money and other possessions,” said his mother.

Ludwig became king quite suddenly in 1865 when he was just 18. His father died unexpectedly of sepsis and the shocked teenager was thrust upon the throne as King Ludwig II of Bavaria.  He had received very little preparation or knowledge of governing by his father or the royal court.

Ludwig immediately faced a variety of foreign and domestic challenges. Bavaria’s sovereignty was in question, the Industrial Revolution was gaining momentum, and the population was growing. Bavaria was a large German state of around five million and a constitutional monarchy. Ludwig initially embraced the business of government. However, it quickly became apparent he was not up to the task.

“I became king much too early. I had not learned enough. Suddenly I was snatched away and set on the throne. Well, I am still trying to learn.” – King Ludwig II

Just a year later in 1866, Ludwig II suffered his greatest, defeat.  The state of Prussia conquered both Bavaria and Austria in “The German War.” The loss meant Bavaria was reduced from an independent nation to an annex of Prussia, within the new “German Nation State.” From then on, the king was basically a vassal of his Prussian uncle.  Ludwig wanted to preserve Bavarian independence, but was now basically powerless. 

Despite the loss, the Bavarian people remained sympathetic to the inexperienced King Ludwig. His subjects saw him as young, handsome, generous, and initially a very visible king to his subjects.

In 1871, the new German Empire was proclaimed with Prussian King Wilhelm as Emperor. For Ludwig, his failure to maintain Bavarian sovereignty was traumatic, causing him to a gradually withdraw from public view.  Losing Bavaria would haunt Ludwig for the rest of his life. It caused him to retreat specifically into the Medieval imagination of his youth.

As for his personal life, while a teen, Ludwig had a relationship with his aide de camp, Prince Paul of Thurn and Taxis. They rode together, read poetry together, and staged scenes from Wagner operas.  In 1867, Ludwig became formally engaged to Duchess Sophie Charlotte in Bavaria, his 19-year-old cousin; and Prince Paul was married off.

The twenty-year-old king then began a secret affair with a riding master in his royal stables, Richard Hornig, whom he made his private secretary. Much to the royal family’s dismay, Ludwig repeatedly postponed his wedding date, then ultimately cancelled the engagement with Sophie. The king would never marry, have an heir, or have any known female mistresses. 

Ludwig also became obsessed with the works of German composer Richard Wagner. From his youth, he was enthralled by Wagner operas and their fantastical German mythology. One of Ludwig’s first actions when he became king was to summon Wagner to his court in Bavaria. The king wanted to realize his dream of a grand Bavarian Opera Festival.

Painting of King Ludwig II and Richard Wagner
Painting of King Ludwig II and Richard Wagner

His summoning of Wagner in fact rescued the composer from numerous angry creditors, as the king paid off all his debts. “He is unfortunately so beautiful and wise, soulful and lordly, that I fear his life must fade away like a divine dream in this base world!” – Richard Wagner.

A tense love-hate, though collaborative relationship developed between them. Ludwig organized huge musical festivals, and built concert halls in Munich to honor Wagner’s work. Wagner in turn acted as Ludwig’s muse, feeding both his fertile imagination and the inspiration for his new palace and castle projects.

Munich became the music capital of Europe with the premieres of “Tristan und Isolde” in 1865, “Die Meistersinger von Nürnberg” (The Mastersingers of Nuremberg) in 1868, “Das Rheingold” (The Rhinegold) in 1869, and “Die Walküre” (The Valkyrie) in 1870. Without Ludwig, Wagner would never have achieved all his works and his greater fame.

Ludwig’s passion with Wagner’s works quickly becomes a dangerous obsession however. He began to lose himself in the Medieval fantasy worlds depicted in Wagner’s operatic myths. He started dressing daily as opera characters from Wagner’s world.  From 1875 on, the king began to live at night and sleep primarily during the day.

Having grown up in Hohenschwangau, the mock-castle built by his father, Ludwig also become obsessed with building extravagant palaces of his own, in order to live out his fantasy world.  They would be grand fortresses of retreat where he could completely hide, nearly alone from the outside world.

His new Linderhof Palace was built as a refuge for the reclusive king to hide away in the countryside. Completed in 1878, this small palace was designed for one person  – Ludwig II.  It had only ten rooms, four for servants.  The dining table had only enough space for one person – himself.  Linderhof also had it own grotto – designed to host small performances of Wagner operas – to an audience of one.

The king then attempted to re-create the grandeur of France’s Versailles. He had the Herrenchiemsee Palace built on a large island in Bavaria’s Lake Chiemsee.  Completed in 1885, it was a another place to assure the eccentric King’s privacy.  He designed the palace to emulate the sharp rectangular lines of Versailles.  Elaborate French paintings were hung in all its rooms.

Of course, Ludwig’s most famous building project – one recognizable around the world – was Schloss Neuschwanstein.  His “New Castle” was based on those of the Middle Ages and built in the foothills of the Alps.  He designed it as both a mountain refuge and a theatre for Wagner operas. Ludwig broke ground in 1869 and moved into the unfinished castle in 1884.

Mad King Ludwig's Neuschwanstein Castle in Bavaria
Mad King Ludwig’s Neuschwanstein Castle in Bavaria

Despite its towering grandeur, Neuschwanstein did not have space for the royal court, only the King’s private residence, a performance Hall of Singers, the Throne Room, and servants’ quarters.  The palace served King Ludwig II as a live-in theatrical setting.  It was dedicated, with numerous operatic murals, to the works of Richard Wagner, who died in 1883 (without ever visiting the castle).

Ludwig’s obsession with a holy kingdom was the reason he built, and built again, places he could imagine himself as a real-life Medieval king.  His fantasy world was reinforced by private performances in the castle of Wagner’s operas, performed for the king alone. Thus Ludwig spent more and more time isolated in the mountains, and less time governing in Munich.

The new castles and palaces were also beyond the fiscal means of the king. He was wasting away huge amounts of time and money. Ludwig’s castle building did not bankrupt Bavaria though. By 1885, he’d accrued a personal debt of 14 million marks – all held against his own family’s name. Foreign banks threatened to seize his properties. Various tradesmen threatened to sue.

He asked foreign governments for loans as he was unable to rein in his extreme spending. He had also become indifferent to state business. As a result, his government’s leaders began making plots. Ludwig II couldn’t be removed from his throne by constitutional means.  But he could be forcibly withdrawn if it was decided he was unfit to rule.

Ludwig no longer received his ministers or secretaries. He avoided the general public, neglecting what was expected of a king. Instead, his life’s purpose became his private performances of Wagner and his 3 elaborate building projects. Ludwig refused to accept the consequences of his spending – the suspension of construction and strict budget management.

As you can imagine, the king’s unusual lifestyle fueled rumors in Bavaria and throughout Europe. Newspapers at home and abroad were openly speculating about the king’s huge debts and even whispering about his sexuality without a wife or heir. Government leaders knew the easiest way to depose of the eccentric king was for him to be declared insane. Senior Minister Johann von Lutz realized that intervention was necessary to save the monarchy and the royal family.

In March, Minister Lutz met with Dr. Bernhard von Gudden, Director of the Upper Bavarian Lunatic Asylum and the physician in charge of Prince Otto. The doctor saw parallels between brother Otto and King Ludwig.  He declared the king was “genuinely insane” and incapable of governing. His judgement was accepted by royal ministers and the royal family.

The King’s sudden deposition was proclaimed to the public on 10 June 1886. Ludwig was utterly shocked and forced to resign from the throne under duress.  Lutz then ordered him to vacate his beloved Neuschwanstein Castle, nearly but not yet completed at the time.

King Ludwig was instead interned in the small Berg Castle in upper Bavaria. The very next day, he died in mysterious circumstances, drowned in nearby Lake Starnberg, together with the psychiatrist who had certified him as insane! What exactly had happened?

Ludwig arrived at Berg Castle on 12 June 1886, accompanied by the “Fangkommission” (Interception Committee). The royal apartment on the second floor was prepared by removing doorknobs, adding peepholes, and closing the shutters.  A “guardian” was always supposed to be near the king  – a stipulation Ludwig found humiliating. It was important to Dr. Gudden that the king not be treated like a mental patient.

Berg Castle on Lake Starnburg where King Ludwig was found dead

Dr. Gudden’s first aim was to reintegrate the king into a regular daily routine. Conversations and walks with others were to be added. It should be noted the psychiatrists did not consider Ludwig to be incurably ill. Ludwig II spent June 13th quietly in Berg Castle. He seemed composed and questioned everyone he spoke to in-depth. After dinner, at about 6:45 pm, he set out with Dr. Gudden for a walk by the lake, not accompanied by the guardian.

It is possible the king ran into the lake, intending to committing suicide.  Gudden also died in the lake, perhaps after a tussle with the King. Afterwards, Ludwig drowned or suffered a heart attack in the cold lake water.

The king’s body was taken to Munich and autopsied at the Residence on 15 June. In addition to the pathologist, representatives of the State Ministry and Foreign Affairs were present. At the autopsy,no injuries were perceptible anywhere on the body, neck or face.” There was also no evidence of “gunshot, head impact or stab wounds”. Drowning could not be proven beyond doubt as the cause of death, so a heart attack was also deemed possible.

The Bavarian constitution provided for a regency in the event that the king was unable to hold office. Ludwig’s younger brother Otto had also been considered mentally ill since 1876.  So only Prince Luitpold, King Ludwig’s uncle, would assume the regency.

Ludwig was laid out in the Residence’s Court Chapel wearing the uniform of the Grand Master of the Wittelsbach Royal Order of Saint Hubertus.  A bouquet of jasmine was in his right hand, picked by his cousin, Empress Elisabeth of Austria. The general public appeared in huge crowds; viewing from the galleries of the court chapel. The funeral procession went through Munich to allow as many as possible to express their sympathy. The coffin was lowered into the crypt of St. Michaels Church, where Ludwig II rests to this day.


Schloss Neuschwanstein was opened to paying visitors by the new Regent and completed, though with a slightly simpler interior and exterior, by 1892.

As to the king’s death, one theory was that Ludwig had killed his psychiatrist (there were signs of a struggle), and Ludwig had then either committed suicide, or drowned accidentally after the struggle in the lake. However, Ludwig had never before displayed violent tendencies.  He had discussed suicide with his psychiatrist, but did not appear inclined to take his own life.  He had also been a strong swimmer from an early age.  So it’s unlikely he would have drowned.

Of course, another theory is that the king was murdered and never truly insane. Siegfried Wichmann, a modern art-historian, claims to have discovered an image of Ludwig’s body, painted at Berg just after his death.  It shows blood dripping from the side of his mouth, which suggests he died of some violent trauma: not drowning. Perhaps someone from the Committee shot him?

Just 50 years ago, Countess Josephine von Wrba-Kaunitz, a distant relative of the Royal family, presented a grey-jacket with a bullet-hole during a tea-party, which she claimed to be King Ludwig II’s – supposed proof of murder! This crucial piece of evidence was lost however in a house fire a few years later. So, unless his corpse is exhumed and examined – unlikely to ever be allowed – we shall never know ‘Mad’ King Ludwig’s true cause of death.

Today, the odd Ludwig would most likely have been diagnosed with ASD (autism spectrum disorder). One can say that the king attempted to live the life of solitude and fantasy in which he was most comfortable in.  And unlike the average person, he had the means to do so. Whether that is the definition of insanity or not, is a question left for interpretation.

Click BOOKS for more by historical writer Paul Andrews
Home » Blog

Milton Hershey and his Chocolate Factory

Chocolate maker Milton S. Hershey, 1900.
Chocolate maker Milton S. Hershey, 1900.

Before Willie Wonka there was Milton Hershey. He created one of America’s most beloved chocolate and candy brands. He made milk chocolate a treat Americans and those around the world could afford. In the process, he created a fortune. Hershey used his vast wealth for philanthropy rather than personal gain.  He built an extraordinary orphanage that would not only take in poor children, but also give them a decent home, teach them lessons in character, and instruct them in how to make their way in the world.

In the Pennsylvania Dutch countryside, the Hershey Chocolate Factory provides tantalizing cocoa smells from a 2-million-square-foot production facility. Tree-lined streets with names like Chocolate Avenue are lit by street lamps shaped like Hershey Kisses. Everything in this town of about 13,000 reflects the Hershey’s Chocolate Company. Once little more than dairy farms, Hershey, PA was transformed into the headquarters of America’s largest candy maker.  The man behind that amazing transformation was Milton S. Hershey.

Milton Snavely Hershey was born 13 September 1857, on a farm outside of Derry Church, PA—a small farming community near the center of the state. Milton was the only surviving child of Henry Hershey and Veronica ‘Fanny’ Snavely. Young Milton grew up amongst the devout, frugal, and hardworking Pennsylvania Dutch. Hershey spent his formative years idolizing his father, a dreamer and drinker who was always looking for the next big opportunity. Unfortunately, Henry Hershey lacked the persistence and work ethic to make anything happen.

Young Milton grew up poor, with holes in his shoes and an empty belly. Later in life, when asked about his philanthropy towards orphans, Hershey simply say, “I was a poor boy myself once.” Milton started his schooling at seven, but changed schools often, as his family moved throughout the region, attending seven different ones.

By 1867, his parents separated and Hershey’s father removed himself from the picture. His mother, the daughter of a Reformed Mennonite clergyman, had given up on her husband’s numerous faults and failures. Under her upbringing, Fanny instilled in young Milton the necessity for, and an appreciation of, honest hard work; values he would keep for the rest of his life.

Due to the lack of steady schooling, he dropped out at 14 to work as an apprentice instead. Hershey took his first job, apprenticing at a small, German-language newspaper, Der Waffenlose Waechter, in Lancaster. He was not cut out for the printing business though. He hated the work and was fired when he threw the owner’s hat into the printing press!

Milton always had an interest in candy making and began apprenticing instead with a master confectioner in Lancaster. He took a job at Joseph Royer’s popular Ice Cream Parlor Garden, where he learned the basics of candy-making. Royer was impressed by the teenager and soon promoted him to candy-making duties in the kitchen.

Four years later at 19, Hershey borrowed $750 from his aunt and set up his own candy shop in the heart of Philadelphia. For five years, Hershey poured his heart and soul into his fledgling business. But he could never make a profit.  He was forced to close shop and headed west to Denver, where he worked again with a confectioner. It was there he learned about caramels. But the entrepreneur in young Hershey wasn’t content to work for someone else.

By the time he was 25, he had attempted to launch two more candy businesses. Both were failures.  The bank finally confiscated his candy-making equipment after he defaulted on a loan. He used his last dollars to buy a ticket back home to Lancaster. At age 30, he was nearly bankrupt.

These many failures did not squash Hershey’s spirits, however. He set out to raise capital for yet another business.  This time however, none of his relatives would offer help. No one trusted his poor track record. In 1883, he was still convinced he could build a successful candy company.  He amassed enough money from bank loans to rent a warehouse. In addition to making caramels, he worked as a handyman to make ends meet.  His mother and aunt helped wrap the caramel candies.

Finally, Milton Hershey got lucky. An English candy importer had tasted one of his delicious “Crystal A” caramels and asked Hershey if he could sell them in England.  Milton knew his product was suited for export as it stayed fresh longer than others. This third attempt, the Lancaster Caramel Company, was finally successful.

Within a few short years, Hershey had a thriving business and was shipping caramels all over the country. By the early 1890s, he had 700 employees and three factories. Never shy of hard labor, he would roll up his sleeves and help shoveling coal or rolling candy. He became known as “Dad Hershey” to his employees, eating lunch with them each day. Orders poured in faster than he could fill them. He was now renting the whole building and bought adjacent properties.

That changed in 1893. Milton visited the World Columbian Exposition in Chicago.  There he viewed the equipment of J. M. Lehmann from Dresden, Germany. Lehmann had built a full-scale chocolate-manufacturing plant for the expo – from roasting-ovens to forming-presses. Hershey eyes popped as he saw his future … in chocolate, not caramel.  He impulsively paid $20,000 to buy every piece of equipment Lehmann had on display!

“Caramels are only a fad. Chocolate is a permanent thing.” – Milton Hershey

Milton Hershey had always been far too busy to consider marriage.  At 41, he was traveling through New York state on business when he stopped in Jamestown to visit a local confectionary, one  frequented by 27 year old Catherine “Kitty” Sweeney.  The two met and a relationship began. Jamestown became a regular stop on Hershey’s travels.

Hershey proposed and they married in 1898. At issue with his family was that Hershey was raised Mennonite, and Sweeney was Irish Catholic. They were wed in the rectory of New York’s St. Patrick’s Cathedral.  They loved each other deeply and she became as important in his life as chocolate. Sadly, the couple were never able to have any children.

In 1900, the American Caramel Company, his chief competitor, offered $1 million ($24 million today) to buy Crystal A caramels.  With such money Milton would be finally able to fully pursue chocolate. Hershey accepted the offer.  “This was the best business deal I ever made,” he later said.

Hershey now focused on perfecting the formula for mass-produced milk chocolate. With his new liquidity, he could finally build a proper chocolate factory. Hershey began looking for a new place. He decided against major cities and picked a spot instead next to his hometown, Derry Church. The site was near many dairy farms, which he would need.  Three years later in 1903, he broke ground. Hershey began building a mammoth, modern candy-making facility.

Hershey did not discover milk chocolate. What he discovered was how to mass produce it at an affordable price. He achieved this through efficiency, technology and design, resulting in a steep cut in cost to him, and price for consumers.  Before Hershey, milk chocolate was an expensive European delicacy. After Hershey, a milk chocolate bar could be enjoyed by anyone, for just a nickel.

The Hershey Chocolate Factory in Hershey, PA. 1915
The Hershey Chocolate Factory in Hershey, PA. 1915

During construction, Milton played with a new formula for making milk chocolate. He spent months experimenting with powdered milk, as the Swiss did, then switched to fresh cream. During many long days of experimenting, the heating temperature, cooking time and order of ingredients were all worked on.

The breakthrough finally came from an employee, John Schmalbach. He found the “sweet-spot” combination that Hershey was looking for, yielding “The Hershey Process.”   It would form the basis for the company’s production for decades. Hershey Chocolate, although tasting different than Swiss chocolate, was accepted by Americans as the taste for their chocolate. His winning ideas continued with the famous Hershey Kiss in 1907.  Milton named them himself for the way in which the chocolate applicator kissed the conveyor belt.

In its first year of operations, the company netted $1 million; five years later, profits topped $2 million.  As his wealth grew and new workers were hired, Hershey set about accommodating them properly. He boldly planned to build an entire new town around his chocolate factory. His plan called for “a natural, American town, where right living and well-paid workers lived in safe, happy homes.

Experience had taught Milton that employees appreciated being treated fairly and worked harder for him. In the town that came to be Hershey, Pennsylvania, he allowed them to live independent of his company.  He built parks, churches, schools, stores, trolleys and a fire department. Homes had modern electricity, indoor plumbing and central heating.

He sponsored a nationwide contest to come up with a name for the town. The winner was Hershey, PA, aka “Chocolate Town USA.” Hershey oversaw most every aspect of the town’s construction, from its tree-lined streets to its public transportation and first-rate schools. In 1907, he opened an amusement park (Hershey Park today). In 1915, he built the nation’s largest, free zoo.

At his philanthropical side was his devoted wife, Kitty. Unable to have children of their own, the Hershey’s devoted a great portion of their wealth towards orphaned kids. Hershey deeded 486 acres of farming land to the Hershey Trust Company for the construction of a school for orphaned boys.

Catherine "Kitty" and Milton Hershey, 1910.
Catherine “Kitty” and Milton Hershey, 1910.

In 1909, the couple opened the Hershey Industrial School. It became a landing spot for orphaned girls as well, in the 1970’s and is now known as the Milton Hershey School. It surrounded Milton and Kitty Hershey with the children they were never able to have. In 1918, Hershey secretly placed all of his shares of the Hershey Chocolate Company into the Trust.

In 1912, Milton Hershey was in London and almost boarded the RMS Titanic during its fateful maiden voyage.  But a last-minute business emergency made him change travel plans. In 1915, a tragedy of a different type struck.  Kitty Hershey was hospitalized in Philadelphia with extensive neuropathy in her limbs. When Hershey arrived, his wife smiled weakly and asked for a glass of champagne to lift her spirits. When Milton returned with a bottle, she had already passed.  On the day of the funeral, a grieving Hershey gave all his employees the day off.

After Catherine’s unexpected death, Hershey quietly transferred much of his wealth, including his stocks and ownership stake in the Hershey Chocolate Company, to The Hershey Trust, which funds the school to this day. The stock was worth roughly $60 million at the time. In 1919, the Hershey’s Company had earned $58 million ($273 million today).

During World War I, sugar prices skyrocketed, but could not topple Hershey’s chocolate factory. His company ran a deficit and a bank mortgaged the property.  Milton Hershey instead decided to increase production and returned Hersheys Chocolate Company to the black by 1921.

More than 600 men worked to build the Hershey Hotel, sports arena, and community theater. All these new sights also created further jobs in maintaining them. In 1935, Hershey gave $20,000 to each of the town’s churches, to help them relieve the hunger of their members. He also established the Hershey Foundation, to support educational and cultural charities. The Foundation created the famous Hershey Gardens in 1942.

He did not reveal the School’s Trust to the public until 1923. “I am 66 years old and do not need much money. I have no heirs, so I decided to make the orphan boys of the U.S. my heirs. The school provides a thorough education, supplemented by instruction in useful trades and a way to make a living.”

Milton Hershey always credited Kitty with the idea for the orphan school. Kitty noted that they now had more money than they could possibly spend in a lifetime and no children. The school also taught the boys to budget and put half of their earnings into a savings account. Upon graduation, Hershey sent them out into the world with $100 cash, a huge amount during the Great Depression.

I have always worked hard, lived rather simply, and tried to give every man a square deal.” – Milton Hershey.

Jack Kerstetter, one of the thousands who attended the school, described the place as “not one with a white a stone wall around it, but an invisible curtain founded by a man who had an idea and shared his love”.  

During World War II, Hershey’s supplied American troops in Europe and the Pacific with more than a billion chocolate bars.  He provided special “Ration D” bars and “Tropical bars,” which did not melt in the hot Pacific theater.  Parts of the chocolate factory in Hershey were even dedicated to the production of munitions for the war effort.

An introverted and reserved man, Hershey had a demeanor that contrasted greatly with that of the equally wealthy Rockefeller’s and Vanderbilt’s. As he had been forced to leave school early, Hershey was driven to make sure those around him received a solid education. His outward display of wealth was rather modest. His chocolate factory and the community he’d created with Kitty meant everything to him.

He continued having business lunches with his managers, keeping close tabs on the company. He made regular appearances at his chocolate factory.  On his 80th birthday, 6,000 Hershey’s employees threw him a spectacular party at the ice hockey arena, complete with a 3-foot-tall cake, and all the current and most of the former children from his Hershey School.

Milton Hershey with one of his orphan school boys. 1940
Milton Hershey with one of his orphan school boys. 1940

Following his Kitty’s death, Hershey never remarried, carrying a picture of her wherever he traveled. Hershey continued to work well into his 80s. Milton Hershey died of a heart attack at age 88 in Hershey on 13 October 1945.  He is buried next to his wife and mother. His legacy as a businessman and philanthropist continues to this day. The man often proclaimed, “Business is a matter of human service.” In 1963, $50 million was diverted from the Foundation to create the Milton S. Hershey Medical Center in Hershey, of course.

The Milton Hershey School currently serves about 1,900 students each year, Thanks to his Trust, the school is one of the wealthiest in the world, with about $66 billion in assets. The M.S. Hershey Foundation funds educational and cultural activities across the country. The Hershey Chocolate Company has endured as one of the world’s greatest candy makers.

A new era, without its long-time leader, brought new challenges. Other rival candy giants, Mars and Nestlé, posed new threats to Hershey Chocolate. Even with fierce competition, the Hershey Company rose to the challenge. The company led active development of new candies for the new century and new generations.

The Hershey brand expanded beyond its Kisses and iconic flat chocolate bars with such names as Twizzlers, Icebreakers, Reese’s, Cadbury, Almond Joy, Milk Duds, Mr. Goodbar, and Bubble Yum. Besides becoming the largest chocolate maker on the continent, the Trust continues to run the Hershey Bears hockey team at the arena, the popular Hersheypark, and Hershey Stadium, all situated, of course, in the town of Hershey, PA.

Milton Hershey died with very little personal wealth, mostly the mansion he once shared with his beloved Kitty. Unlike other billionaires, he had given away everything else.I never could see what happiness a rich man gets from contemplating a life of acquisition only, with a cold and legal distribution of his wealth after he passes away.” 

Click BOOKS for more by historical writer Paul Andrews.
Home » Blog

Heroic WWI Nurse Edith Cavell – shot by German Firing Squad

Edith, Cavell, British Red Cross Nurse during World War I, 1914
Edith Cavell, British Red Cross Nurse during World War I, 1914

Edith Cavell was a pioneering British Red Cross nurse, working in German-occupied Belgium during the World War I. Despite the risks, she secretly helped hundreds of wounded British, French and Belgian soldiers escape from German custody into Holland.  She was arrested and executed in October 1915 by a firing squad of German soldiers. Who was this courageous woman you likely never heard of?

Edith Louisa Cavell was born in 1865 in the English village of Swardeston, Norfolk. She was the daughter of a vicar and the eldest of four children. As a child, she raised funds for a new Sunday School room by selling her own artwork. Her favorite pastimes were tennis and dancing, and she once danced till her feet bled in a new pair of shoes. Educated in the UK, Cavell spent five years working as a governess with the Francoise family in Belgium and became fluent in both French and Dutch.  She returned home in 1895 to care for her ill father. Nursing her father back to health  inspired Cavell to completely change professions and become a nurse instead.

In 1896, she began her nursing training at the Royal London Hospital in Whitechapel. Her instructor remarked that she was not punctual and therefore ‘not a nurse who could be relied upon.’ Edith took it as a challenge and would prove her wrong.  She worked in hospitals in Shoreditch, Kings Cross and Manchester before moving back to Belgium. She came close to marriage, but never had a husband or children, devoting herself to her nursing passion instead.

In 1907, she accepted a position in Brussels as Matron in Belgium’s newly established training hospital and nursing school, ‘L’Ecole Belge d’Infirmieres Diplomees’ with Dr. Antoine Depage. There was no established nursing profession in Belgium at the time.  Until then, nuns had been responsible for the care of the sick and, however well intentioned, they had no training.

Due to her pioneering work in new nursing techniques, she is considered the founder of modern nursing in that country. By 1910, she had so advanced the nursing profession in Belgium that she began a professional nursing journal, L’infirmiere.  In 1911, she was a Training Nurse for three hospitals, 24 schools, and 13 kindergartens. By 1914, she was giving four lectures a week to doctors and nurses alike.

She was in Norfolk on holiday, visiting her mother in 1914, when World War I exploded across Europe. On hearing of the threat to Belgium from the advancing German troops, she felt it was her duty to not run from war but return to Brussels. Over her mother’s protests, she declared, “At a time like this, I am needed now more than ever.”

Cavell worked in hospitals treating all soldiers who needed help, regardless of their nationality. When war was declared on Germany by England in August 1914, Cavell’s training school for nurses in Brussels was taken over by the Red Cross, treating casualties from the trenches on both sides, as well as civilians.

In November, the Germans occupied Brussels and it came under German military law. The Red Cross Journal later reported in November 1915: “Edith Cavell might have saved herself and left Brussels, but she elected to stay at her post. 60 English nurses were sent home. She remained.”

Edith ended up doing far more than nursing.  She soon began to work with the Belgian underground intelligence network, La Dame Blanche. They smuggled Allied soldiers into neutral Holland and Edith stepped up to help. Knowing how dangerous this was, Cavell kept her work secret from her fellow nurses. She became part of a network of people who sheltered Allied soldiers, arranging their escape.

Edith Cavell, center, with her Belgian Red Cross nurses in Brussels, 1914
Edith Cavell, center, with her Belgian Red Cross nurses in Brussels, 1914

In December 1914, La Dame Blanche asked Edith to help two wounded British soldiers trapped behind German lines following the Battle of Mons. She treated the men in her hospital and then arranged to have them successfully smuggled out of Belgium into the neutral Netherlands. She gave one of the men her Bible with a letter to her mother in Norfolk.

Cavell then began harboring other British and French soldiers and smuggling them out of occupied Belgium.  She provided them with false papers created by La Dame Blanche. They were then conducted by guides, often to her own house and others who were secretly a part of her cause.  The men were then furnished with clothes, money, and led to the Dutch border.

Over the next 11 months, she helped over 200 British, French and Belgian soldiers, sheltering them first in the hospital or her home ,and arranging for guides to shuttle them to the border. She often heard back from the soldiers she helped, thanking her when they arrived safely in Britain.

German authorities became increasingly suspicious of Edith Cavell as the source of the missing wounded prisoners.  Adding to that suspicion was Cavell’s outspoken opinions about the cruelty of the German occupation.  She did not shy away from speaking up publicly in Brussels.

The Germans arrested two members of the escape team on 31 July 1915. Under interrogation, they revealed Edith’s name.  She had also been betrayed by a Frenchman, later convicted in French court as a German collaborator. After an investigation, on 5 August 1915, she was arrested by German military police and placed in solitary confinement in St Gilles Prison in Brussels. Edith was charged with harboring enemy Allied soldiers – a crime punishable by death. 

She was held in prison for almost 3 months.  When German authorities interrogated her, she proudly told truth.  She was responsible for harboring and transporting out of the country, 80 British soldiers, 25 French soldiers, and about 100 French and Belgian citizens.  Edith was tried at a court martial on 7 October 1915, along with 34 other people involved in or connected to the secret network.

She freely admitting at her trial that she had “successfully conducted allied soldiers to the enemy of the German people,” Edith willingly signed a written statement, confirming her involvement, though never named her co-conspirators.  She offered no defense of her actions other than she was simply doing her duty as a nurse.

According to German law, such an offense was punishable by death, a law that also applied to foreigners.  Ordinarily, the Geneva Convention protected medical personnel.  The German court stated that Cavell’s actions were belligerent and that she had thus forfeited such protection. Most of the 34 were sentenced to hard labor – but not Cavell.

British  government officials stated that they were sadly powerless to assist Miss Cavell.  There was an international plea for mercy. The United States had not entered the war yet but they did apply diplomatic pressure on Germany, stating that if Germany executed Cavell their already sullied reputation would be irrevocably damaged.  The German civil governor was told that, along with the sinking of the Lusitania, the execution of Cavell would cause disgust in the civilized world.

The German civil governor recommended that Cavell be pardoned because of the humanitarian work she did as a nurse.  The military governor, however, ordered her execution. The Germans worried that if they gave her lenience, an upsurge of resistance would occur because they would have no fear of retribution.

The night before her execution, she told a British minister, who provided her Holy Communion that, “I expected my sentence. Standing as I do in view of God and Eternity. Patriotism is not enough.  I must have no hatred or bitterness to anyone.”  These words are inscribed on a statue of Cavell in Trafalgar Square in central London.  Edith’s most treasured possessions during her incarceration were the roses sent by her nurses, which she kept in her cell long after they wilted.

Her final words, spoken to a German priest the next day, were “Tell my loved ones that my soul is safe, and that I am glad to die for my country.”  Edith Cavell was shot dead by an 8 member firing squad at six paces at the Tir National, the Brussels firing range, at 7 am on 12 October 1915. She was buried in Brussels next to the prison. She was 49 years old. German Private Rimmel is said to have thrown down his rifle when ordered to fire at Nurse Cavell, and to have been shot by a German officer for refusing to obey orders.

She became a symbol of the Allied cause.  Her memory was invoked in recruitment posters and messages in Britain and around the world. News about her death caused British recruiting to double for 8 weeks after her death. Edith’s dying played an important role in further forming American opinion about Germany.  The disgust at her treatment eased America’s entry into the war in 1917.

That same year, two British newspapers raised funds in memory of Edith Cavell, dedicated to the creation of six rest homes for nurses around England. Many nurses had also suffered greatly in the war and needed long term care as well.

After the war, her body was exhumed and escorted to Britain. On May 1919, in the Westminster Abbey, a memorial service was held for her.  She was laid to rest in Norwich Cathedral, near her birthplace.  The Red Cross Journal at the time reported that Edith Cavell was “a brave and patriotic lady, a distinguished member of the nursing profession who had done nothing worthy of death.”

Then Prime Minister Herbert Henry Asquith said: “We cannot at this moment forget, the imperishable story of the last hours of Edith Cavell. Thank God we have examples of all the qualities which have sustained our Empire. Let us be worthy of them.”


Edith Cavell was indeed a brave and patriotic woman who devoted her life to nursing and her country.  Perhaps the truest assessment of her would be to recognize her as she saw herself – as simply ‘a nurse who tried to do her duty.’  These values have lived on in her legacy, as she continues to inspire women.

Edith Cavell with her two dogs, Brussels, 1915
Edith Cavell with her two dogs. Brussels, 1915

A memorial statue for Edith Cavell was built near Trafalgar Square for her extraordinary life. The Red Cross remembered her with a bronze medal showing her portraits. On the back it says: 1915 REMEMBER!  The Church of England recognizes October 12th as the day for commemoration of Edith Cavell, patriot and nurse. In 2015, exhibitions took place to mark the 100th anniversary of her death. The Royal Mint created £5 coins featuring her portrait.

As a nurse, Edith Cavell did not shrink from death.  “I have seen death so often it is not strange, or fearful to me!”  She wrote to her fellow nurses while in prison, “I have told you that devotion will give you real happiness. Your whole duty and a good heart will be your greatest support in the hard moments of life and even in the face of death.” 

Click BOOKS for more by historical writer Paul Andrews.
Home » Blog

The Windscale Nuclear Disaster – Britain’s Chernobyl

The Windscale Nuclear Facility, England, 1957
The Windscale Nuclear Facility, England, 1957

In 1957, in an English seaside town, a new type of disaster occurred when a fire broke out at the Windscale nuclear reactors. The fire, at the two-reactor facility in Cumbria (now Sellafield), was due to poor design and gross mismanagement, leading to deadly consequences. The incident became embroiled in Cold War-era secrecy and proved the desperate lengths the British government was willing to go to become a global nuclear power.

The origins of the Windscale nuclear fire can be found within the decades long Cold War, specifically the nuclear arms race.  Most nuclear projects in Britain and the U.S. were focused on deterring attacks from the Soviet Union, who were also building up their own massive nuclear arsenal.

For the UK, having nuclear bombs was not just about Soviet deterrence; but also about Britain remaining a world power. Following World War II, Britain’s empire and global influence was in steady decline.  It needed to prove itself capable of making atomic weapons by itself. It was under these political pressures that construction of the Windscale reactors began.

At the start of the 1950s, Britain built two nuclear reactors, then referred to simply as ‘Piles’, at the Windscale Works in Cumbria on the northwestern coast of England. The reactors were not built to produce electrical power, but rather plutonium-239 for use in nuclear weapons. Each reactor was fueled by 180 metric tons of uranium with 2,000 tons of graphite moderators. In 1952, the British government put the completed Windscale Piles online.

The Windscale Piles were planned and constructed far too rapidly.  The reactor’s chimneys were partly complete when Sir John Cockcroft, Director of the atomic energy regulator, insisted that radioactive particle filters be added in case of an accident.  By then, filters could only be added on top, rather than within the chimneys where they needed to be.

Another issue was that this new nuclear technology was not perfectly understood by the scientists who designed it. The relatively low temperatures at which the Piles were operating caused a build-up of “Wigner Energy,” which could increase temperatures in the reactor if allowed to accumulate.  When the engineers finally noticed the problem, their only available solution was to heat the Piles hotter than normal to help release the energy. This process, called ‘Annealing,’ seemed to work.

The reactors were built with an air-cooling, rather than the typical water-cooling, system of most nuclear reactors.  This increased the possibility of radioactive air being blown out onto the unsuspecting English countryside.  Filters were added at the insistence of John Cockcroft, but at the wrong location on the chimneys.

Other corners were cut to save money and produce plutonium faster than the Piles were capable of safely producing. Windscale was plagued with safety concerns from the start, due to the tight deadlines and time constraints ordered by the British government, who wanted atomic bombs ASAP.

In October, a fire broke out in Windscale’s Pile 1 while it was being routinely “annealed.”  When the process was initiated on October 8th, the pile failed to get warm enough to regulate the Wigner energy levels in the graphite moderators. Wigner energy increases because of the displacement of carbon atoms in the graphite lattice. This energy needed to be regularly annealed through the heating process that released the energy.

When the process was tried again the next day, October 9th, the pile became sufficiently hot (uranium temperature of 250 C), but strangely stayed hot. Then as the staff watched in shock, the temperature reading within the Reactor 1 began to rise and rise.  It reached an alarming 400 C, the hottest the reactor had ever reached. Air fans failed to cool down the pile.

On October 10th, the site engineers realized in horror what was happening. The interior of the reactor now glowed with heat.  A protective aluminum cannister had burst inside Pile 1 allowing the uranium to catch file.  Uranium fuel cartridges were now incredibly hot.  Engineers discovered flames at the back of Pile 1!

The reactor’s engineers and operators frantically made several different efforts to fight the fire. First, they attempted to knock the burning uranium away manually using long metal poles. Then carbon dioxide was pumped into the pile in an attempt to smother the flames. Neither strategy had an effect.

On October 11th at 9 AM, water was turned on, with the flow increased through the day from an initial flow of 300 gallons per minute, to 800 gal/min, to 1,000 gal/minute by Noon. The water flow continued until the next day, October 12th with no effect. Finally, the engineers closed off the airflow to the reactor and the fire died out. The reactor slowly cooled down to a stable temperature and everyone in the control room breathed a heavy sigh of relief.

It became the worst accidental release of radioactive materials in British history. Local residents in nearby Nethertown, Gosforth and Seascale were not evacuated or even notified that a facility fire was taking place, There were left in the dark and therefore exposed to radiation.  Fortunately, Cockcroft’s filters, nicknamed “Cockcroft’s follies” at the time,  had prevented the impact from being far worse.

Following the fire, environmental measurements were taken to determine the spread of radiation.  Measurements showed atmospheric dispersion of radioactive materials throughout England, Wales and parts of northern Europe with the highest concentrations to be I-131 and Cs-137. Of the two, the bigger focus was on the I-131 as the most hazardous consequence of the fire.

The most visible action at the time, and the only one the government acknowledged, dealt with milk contamination. Despite fears over the potential cancer risks posed to locals, especially children, the main course of action taken was the destruction of around 250,000 gallons of milk from farms within 300 square miles of the facility.

After radioactive iodine-131 particles were released into the air, they fell onto farmland grasses and were eaten by dairy cows. The milk produced would then contain enough radioactive iodine to raise the risks of thyroid cancer, especially in children who drank it. Further, the government banned sales of milk from within 200 square miles of Windscale, but for only a month.

Windscale Disaster spread of radiation, 1957
Windscale Disaster spread of radiation, 1957

Other than this, the government insisted the population need not worry. In fact, radioactive particles had spread across the northern UK and eastward over Europe.  The disaster would later be rated Level Five on the seven-point International Nuclear Event Scale – the same as the USA’s Three Mile Island disaster.

The British government downplayed the accident. The government’s report on the fire was deemed unpublishable due to the secrecy risk it posed.  Harold Macmillan, then UK Prime Minister, mandated that only the summary of the report be published.  British nuclear physicist Sir William Penney’s report on the incident was censored and blamed the staff. The pile operators had resorted to shaving down the protective fins of the aluminum cartridges that housed the uranium to increase yield.

The members of government, who had ignored safety risks by putting pressure on the factory to produce plutonium faster, were quick to shift blame to the Pile operators.  An investigation by Sir Alexander Fleck prompted the 1971 creation of the National Radiological Protection Board (NRPB). The Windscale site, renamed Sellafield in the 1980’s, has continued to host energy generation and waste management since.


Recent reports have concluded that the fire was ultimately caused by the project’s emphasis on speed and output over safety.  It was not until the late 1980s, 30 years later, that relevant documents were declassified and made available. In 1990, the director of the UK’s National Radiological Protection Board estimated that the fire had likely caused about 100-240 local deaths from cancer, in addition to countless non-fatal cancers. It was a high price to pay for the Cold War arms race.

For decades, Pile 1 remained sealed away, unused though monitored. In recent years, a slow process of decommissioning has begun including clean-up of the fire’s effects.  In 2021, the government announced that it had demolished Pile 1’s infamous chimneys. Spent fuel also needs to be treated and stored. The target date for completing all decommissioning activities at Sellafield is 2040.

It can be argued that 20th century governments, 75 years ago, believed that the benefits justified the risks. However, in cases like Windscale and later Chernobyl, the politics of the Cold War encouraged governments on either side to take fewer cautions against the public health risks posed by their nuclear projects.

In a post-Chernobyl/Fukushima world, it seems horrifying that governments would have such a careless reaction, but in the 1950s, many countries downplayed or covered up the environmental and health risks posed by their nuclear programs. Both Windscale and Chernobyl were operating with poor designs; pressure for fast results; and with safety risks accepted as a means of rushing timelines and, of course, saving money.

Click BOOKS for more by historical writer Paul Andrews.
Home » Blog

The MV Doña Paz – the Worst Maritime Disaster in History

Doña Paz on fire following its collision with an oil tanker in the Philippines Sea,1987

While the Titanic may be the most famous shipwreck, its death toll was but a third of the world’s deadliest, taking the lives of over 4,300 souls.  Just five days before Christmas, the MV Doña Paz ferry collided with an oil tanker, burnt to the water line, and sank in the Philippine Sea.  “Asia’s Titanic” was the deadliest peacetime maritime disaster of the 20th century.

On December 20, 1987, a routine ferry journey turned catastrophic and shocked the world.  The disaster exposed inadequate safety measures, vast overcrowding, and a lack of maritime regulations.  How could this have happened?

The MV Doña Paz was a passenger ferry operated by Sulpicio Lines, a major Philippine shipping company.  That night, the ferry was travelling on a routine trip from Tacloban City in Leyte, to the capital of Manila. The ferry had a registered capacity of 1,518 passengers.  The official manifest listed 1,593 passengers and 60 crewIt was grossly overloaded with more than 4,300 passengers —many unregistered, including children, traveling without proper tickets.

Earlier, on 20 December 1987, the Doña Paz departed from Tacloban, Leyte Island, for the Philippines capital of Manila, with a stopover at Catbalogan, Samar. The atmosphere aboard the overcrowded Doña Paz was nevertheless quite festive. Passengers were looking forward to reuniting with loved ones for the Christmas season, completely unaware of the tragedy that awaited them.

At 10:30 pm (22:30), most of the passengers were sleeping in seats or crammed onto floors.  While sailing near Dumali Point, along the busy Tablas Strait near Mindora, the ferry suddenly collided with the oil tanker, MT Vector. The tanker was on route from Bataan to Masbate, carrying 1,041 tons of gasoline and over 7,000 barrels of other flammable petroleum products.

The collision sparked a massive explosion and fire onboard the oil tanker. It also rained down flames and flammable petroleum onto the deck of the ferry.  Within minutes, the Doña Paz and the surrounding sea were also aflame. Survivors described waking up after sensing the crash.  The following explosion aboard the Vector, panic ensued on the ferry ship.

The MV Doña Paz had no working radio, leaving it unable to send out distress signals. A power blackout left the ship without lights.  Passengers onboard could not access life vests which were locked away in cabinets on deck. None of the Doña Paz crew members were at their posts.  Only an apprentice seaman was on the ship’s bridge at the time of the collision. Officers were drinking beer and watching TV in the rec. room.

The crew panicked as well.  With a lack of guidance, the panicked passengers clawed over each other to reach the upper deck. Those who made it, then had to quickly decide if they should stay onboard their burning vessel OR jump into the flaming waters surrounding the ship. Gasoline had leaked onto the water and caught fire as well.

Passengers faced a disorienting panic. Survivors reported that the crew failed to provide instructions or assistance in the chaos. With fire spreading throughout ship, panicked passengers on deck jumped into the burning sea. There they faced thick black smoke or being engulfed by the flames of the burning oil slick.

Intense flames quickly consumed both vessels and turned the sea into a fiery inferno. It took only two hours for the Doña Paz to sink into the strait and four hours for the MV Vector.

In the ensuing rescue, only 24 survivors were rescued—21 from the Doña Paz and 3 from the Vector’s 13-man crew. These floating survivors were picked by passing ships or vessels responding to the distress call from the Vector. Most survivors had sustained third degree burns. None of the crew of the Doña Paz survived. The majority of the passengers perished in the flames, the sea, or went down trapped within the ship.

While the ferry’s manifest listed only 1,593 passengers and crew, investigators discovered that 4,386 people were aboard.  This far exceeded its maximum capacity.  The sheer number of unlisted passengers made it impossible to account for everyone. The official tally made the Doña Paz the deadliest peacetime maritime disaster in history, surpassing both the Titanic and Lusitania.

The investigation that followed revealed a series of major failures and oversights:

  1. The Doña Paz was packed with passengers way beyond its legal capacity.  Many were not listed in the ship’s manifest, making it difficult to track the actual number of dead.
  2. Survivor testimonies indicated that the ferry’s crew were woefully unprepared for such a catastrophe. Passengers had no access to locked up life vests or emergency equipment. The crew themselves were untrained in guiding passengers.
  3. The MT Vector was not seaworthy. The tanker was sailing without a valid license.  Its crew lacked proper training to handle hazardous materials. Why had it been allowed to operate at all?
  4. The collision instantly ignited the Vector’s cargo, causing a rapid and devastating fire. The absence of fire safety equipment aboard the Doña Paz doomed the ferry.

In the aftermath of the disaster, public outrage grew in the Philippines.  There were widespread calls demanding improved maritime safety regulations. However, no one was held accountable. Both the owners of the Doña Paz and the MV Vector denied responsibility.  Lawsuits dragged on for over a decade.

The maritime authorities and Philippine government were both criticized for their lack of oversight and failure to enforce safety protocols.  Some reforms were introduced to strengthen maritime safety standards.  Still, many felt the authorities failed to take adequate steps to prevent another such disaster. International maritime organizations called for stricter enforcement of regulations.

They ship found the ship unseaworthy and operating without a license, a lookout, or a qualified master. The investigation by the Philippine Coast Guard revealed that the crew were not at their assigned posts and were unable to guide evacuation efforts.  They attributed the death toll to overloading, a common practice in the Philippine ferry industry.

The incident was a mix of corrupt practices – allowing illegal purchase of extra tickets amid the Christmas season, poor oversight by authorities, and an inadequate safety culture onboard. In 1979, the ship was named Don Sulpicio when it suffered a major fire and declared a loss. The ship was refurbished however and came back in service as the “Doña Paz”.

The Doña Paz before the disaster.
The Doña Paz before the disaster.

Sadly, the Doña Paz is part of a long list of disasters in Philippine maritime history.  From 1972 to 1987, there were 80 collisions, 177 sinkings and 53 fires.  Sulpicio Lines was involved in a total of four deadly shipping accidents, resulting in 5,000 deaths in 11 years. In 1987,  the Doña Marilyn, sister ship of Doña Paz, sank off Leyte province, killing around 300. In 1998, 200 died when the Princess of the Orient, another sister ship, sank in stormy seas near Batangas.

Although the marine inquiry and the courts ruled that the Doña Paz owner was not to blame, the evidence revealed an unacceptablely poor safety culture within the company. In 2015, the CPC of Sulpicio Lines was suspended. It now operates under a different name and ships cargo only.

The environmental consequences of the oil spill had a lasting impact on the marine ecosystem of the Tablas Strait. The explosion and sinking released large quantities of fuel, one of the worst oil spills in Philippine history.  The oil slick damaged fragile coastal ecosystems, wreaking havoc on local fish populations. The damage to coral reefs took years to heal. In some areas, the impact was irreversible. The Tablas Strait was marked by reduced fish stocks, affecting the livelihoods of coastal communities.


The Doña Paz Disaster is a stark reminder of the dangers of inadequate safety standards and corrupt practices. In maritime history, the disaster stands as a tragic lesson on the importance of both enforcing regulations and preventing negligence. Every December 20th, Filipinos remember the thousands of lives lost in the disaster, offering prayers and memorials for those souls who perished.  The Doña Paz disaster serves as a sobering reminder of what happens when corporate profits are put before public safety.

Click BOOKS for more by historical author Paul Andrews
Home » Blog

The Spirited Alice Roosevelt Longworth – Teddy’s Oldest Daughter

Alice Roosevelt, oldest daughter of Theodore Roosevelt, 1902
Alice Roosevelt, oldest daughter of Theodore Roosevelt, 1902

Alice Roosevelt Longworth was the oldest daughter of President Theodore Roosevelt.  She grew up to become just as outspoken and strong-willed as her father.  Alice was the most unconventional first daughter ever to live in the White House.  She became a Washington socialite and political power broker with a keen intellect and a razor-sharp tongue.

Her boldly independent, free-spirit breathed a new life into the concept of womanhood in the early 20th century, just as the Suffrage movement was gaining momentum. She would be involved in both woman’s rights and later, the sexual revolution of the 1960’s.   Even her iron-willed father admitted he could not control his free-willed daughter.

Alice Roosevelt was the only daughter of a young Theodore Roosevelt and his first wife, Alice Lee, whom he loved deeply. Two days after giving birth in 1884, Alice Lee tragically died of Bright’s Disease. That same day, Teddy’s mother Martha died just hours earlier of typhoid fever, downstairs in the same house.

 A distraught, 25-year-old Theodore named his new little girl for his late wife.  He was so overcome with grief, that he would never call his daughter by her name, and instead referred to her as Baby Lee. Not only would Roosevelt never say the name “Alice” again, but he would not let anyone else say it around him either.

To deal with his crippling grief, Teddy Roosevelt left New York City and started a ranch in the wild Badlands of North Dakota.  He left his daughter under the care of his sister Anna (Bamie) in New York. While away, Teddy worked through his grief far from baby Alice. He raised cattle. He hunted buffalo. He even boxed with a gunfighter in a saloon.

Bamie would have a huge influence on Alice due to her own strong and independent nature. When Teddy returned to Alice two years later in 1886, he married his high school sweetheart, Edith Carow. The new family moved to Oyster Bay, Long Island, and Teddy and Edith had five more children. But tensions formed between Teddy’s second wife and his oldest daughter.

Her step-mother Edith was jealous of Roosevelt’s past relationship with his first wife and took out these insecurities on young Alice. Edith once told the girl that if her ‘dull’ mother had lived, she would have bored her father Teddy to death. Matters only worsened as Alice Lee grew into an attractive young woman.

Alice Roosevelt became both strong-willed and fiercely independent. Edith could not control her and implored Teddy to send the girl to a private boarding school. The fiery young girl replied, “If you send me away, I will humiliate you. I will do something that will shame you. I tell you, I will!” To Edith’s dismay, Teddy relented. They sent Alice Roosevelt back to her Aunt Bamie instead to be tutored.

In 1901, the Roosevelt family’s life changed forever when Teddy became President on the death of William McKinley.  He was now in the public eye more than ever.  Alice was now 17.  When Roosevelt took office, he brought his wife and six young children into the White House, whose playful antics charmed the country.

It was the lively Alice who quickly became the focus of the press’ adulation and scrutiny. Glowing reports were printed about her society debut at the White House in 1902. Soon, the color “Alice Blue,” based on the dress she wore, was a sought-after fashion staple. Songs were even named after the first daughter.

Princess Alice,” as the press called her, had become an instant sensation.  She smoked cigarettes in public (her father forbid her to smoke under his roof). She stayed out late partying and rode back in cars with men unchaperoned.  She was even seen placing sports bets with a bookie.

Once asked by the press about his daughter’s wild exploits, Teddy Roosevelt replied with exasperation, “I can either run the country, or I can attend to Alice, but I cannot possibly do both.” Alice grew distant from her father as she was angered by his refusal to still not call her by her name.

She had become the opposite for what a “young lady” of her time was supposed to be. She was cheered at Mardi Gras in New Orleans, welcomed by fireworks during a visit to Cuba, and greeted by fans at the 1904 St. Louis World’s Fair. Edith Roosevelt chided Alice for waving to her fans during Teddy’s 1905 inauguration.

Her free spirit caused much of the public to fall in love with her. “She has become one of the most regarded women in the world,” the NY Tribune wrote of her.  The press was present when she became the first woman to drive alone in a car, when she raced up and down the streets of Washington.  She smoked publicly, chewed gum, played poker, often wore pants, partied all night, and slept till noon.

Alice kept a dagger and a pet garter snake in her purse. She often phoned in tips of her whereabouts to reporters so that she could collect the cash rewards offered for info about her. The New York Herald printed a running score of her social life over the course of one 15-month period, which included 407 dinners, 350 balls, 300 parties, and 680 teas.

Despite their battle of wills, Roosevelt was shrewd enough to capitalize on his daughter’s popularity. In 1905, he sent her on a high-visibility trip – a month’s long diplomatic mission to Asia, with stops in Japan, China, Korea and the Philippines. Members of the mission included Secretary of War William Taft, 7 senators, 23 congressmen, and other diplomats.

She was welcomed by the Emperor Meiji of Japan and Empress Dowager Cixi of China—a testament to her role as her father’s emissary. She did not abandon her fun entirely, making news by jumping into the ship’s pool fully clothed, then urging members of the delegation to join her.  Many young women viewed Alice Roosevelt as the future of womanhood and cheered her on.

Alice was equal amounts competitive with her father and fiercely loyal to him. “Being the offspring of a very conspicuous parent, I wasn’t going to let him get the better of me.”  She once pointed out that her extroverted father was “the bride at every wedding, the corpse at every funeral, and the child at every baptism.

Every time she was spotted out with a man, people speculated that she’d marry him.  While on the Asia tour, Alice met her future husband, Congressman Nicholas Longworth. When she returned from China, they announced their engagement. He was a debonair bachelor and Washington socialite — who also resembled Theodore Roosevelt.

News of Alice’s engagement to a politician 15 years older unleashed a media frenzy. The public gathered outside the White House on February 17, 1906, in hopes of glimpsing the political wedding of the century. The event was so festive the press likened it to a national holiday. Well-wishers lined the streets hoping for a glimpse of the famous couple.

Nicholas Longworth & Alice Roosevelt with Theodore Roosevelt 1906
Nicholas Longworth & Alice Roosevelt with Theodore Roosevelt 1906

Inside the East Room, dignitaries and emissaries watched the bride slice the wedding cake, not with a knife but with a sword.Miss Roosevelt looked as pretty as she ever did in her life, and that is saying a good deal,” the New York Times gushed. “The best pictures that have been printed do not do justice.”

Princess Alice received ornate gifts befitting royalty – a gold box from England’s King Edward VII, a diamond bracelet from Germany’s Wilhelm II and jewelry from the dowager empress of China.  Of the marriage that followed, Alice later admitted, “I hardly reveled in it.” Both of them partied often and had various affairs, though they remained married.

In the election of 1912, Taft once a close friend of her father, was now a bitter rival.  Roosevelt was trying for a third term in his newly formed Progressive Bull Moose Party, which split the Republican vote. Alice’s public insults of Mrs. Taft caused her to be banned from White House events. After her father lost, Alice buried a voodoo doll of first lady Nellie Taft in the White House garden.

Woodrow Wilson emerged victorious over both her father and Taft. She vocally opposed Wilson’s League of Nations at the end of World War I. She was banned from the White House again by the Wilsons.  When Teddy died in 1919, Alice Roosevelt took up her father’s political causes. She became known as the “Other Washington Monument.”

In 1925, Longworth and Alice purchased 2009 Massachusetts Avenue. What attracted them to the property was its location. Dupont Circle and Massachusetts Avenue was where Washington’s power elite and millionaire industrialists owned mansions.  It was an imposing five-story, limestone house, consisting of 20 rooms and 6 baths.

Alice began a lifetime of influence in Washington circles. She was a formidable friend—or foe—of every president who followed her father.  Even relatives were not spared. Longworth publicly opposed her Democratic cousin Franklin Roosevelt for President in 1932.  She said of him, “The same surname is about all we have in common…. I am a Republican…. I am going to vote for Hoover.

Alice was a harsh and outspoken critic of her cousin Franklin’s New Deal during the Great Depression. Alice once declared that her cousin Franklin was “one-third sap and two-thirds Eleanor.” Eleanor Roosevelt countered that Alice Longworth led a life that was “one long pursuit of pleasure and excitement, and rather little real happiness.”

Her marriage was rocky throughout the years. Alice had a long affair with Senator William Borah in the 1920’s.  By her own later admission, Borah was the father of her only child, a daughter, Paulina Longworth. She was born shortly after Alice’s 41st birthday in 1925.

When Nicholas died in 1931, her family fortune was nearly exhausted.  Alice needed to find a source of income.  In 1933, she published her autobiography “Crowded Hours,” full of tales and reminiscences of her father, family, and public life. She even posed for cold cream and a cigarette advertisements.

“Mrs. L.” managed to rein over Washington social and political scene for decades to come. Politicians sought Alice’s advice and opinions at her famous dinner parties. Alice frequently brought power brokers together in her home. She could either aid or hinder candidates and Congressional bills. She denied influencing floor votes, but regular visits to congressional hearings suggest otherwise.

Alice Roosevelt Longworth and First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy, 1962
Alice Roosevelt Longworth and First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy, 1962

She encouraged Nixon to run for president and continued to invite him to her famous dinners.  Although a staunch Republican, Alice later became smitten with the Kennedys. She assisted First Lady Jacqueline in restoring the White House. She changed parties after the assassination and supported Bobby Kennedy in 1968.

When Nixon became president, he invited Alice to his formal White House dinners.  That same year, Nixon threw an 87th birthday party for her at the White House.  In true form, she said of the occasion, “It was so gruesome. Everyone looks at you and wonders if she’ll last another year.”  Her friendship with Nixon ended with the Watergate Scandal. 

Her social sphere was not limited to just presidents and lawmakers. She always appeared when foreign dignitaries were in town: Alice met Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip in 1976, during their visit for America’s bicentennial celebration. She also stayed active in feminist causes important to American woman, calling Gloria Steinem “one of my heroes.”

In the 1960s and 1970s, Dupont Circle became home to hippies, and the so-called “Duchess of Dupont Circle,” continued to live there. One night during the Vietnam War protests, she stuck her head out a window during a demonstration and got a whiff of police tear gas, which she said, “cleared my sinuses.”

Her house was cluttered with animal skins and stuffed heads from her father’s many hunting expeditions, and filled with a lifetime collection of books and photographs. “After reading all night, I like a day that begins at 11 am.” Alice slept in a bedroom with a refrigerator stocked with late night snacks to accompany her reading.

Her only daughter, Paulina, would struggle with depression and addiction her entire life.  Paulina’s husband had died in 1951 and she died of an overdose of sleeping pills in 1957. This left Alice to care for her now-orphaned granddaughter, Joanna Sturm alone. Joanna would go on to have a daughter herself, who she named Alice.


In her final years, as Alice Roosevelt Longworth began showing signs of senility. Her granddaughter would call Alice’s friends and urge them to come to visit.  “I don’t think I am cruel or insensitive. I laugh, I have a sense of humor,” Alice Roosevelt Longworth said in an interview, “I like to tease … Isn’t it strange how that upsets some people?” When Alice recalled her young life, “I must admit a sense of mischief does get hold of me from time to time. I had an appetite for being entertained.”

Although Alice was Theodore Roosevelt’s firstborn child, she was the last of his children to die. She died at age 96 in 1980. President Carter’s official statement said, “She had style, she had grace, and she had a sense of humor that kept generations of Washington politicians wondering which was worse—to be skewered by her or be ignored by her.” At her own request, her granddaughter buried her without fanfare in Washington’s Rock Creek Cemetery next to her husband.

Alice Roosevelt was well known for her famous quips“The secret of eternal youth is arrested development.” Another was, “My specialty is detached malevolence.”  She stated that her philosophy in life was quite simple. “Fill what’s empty, empty what’s full, and scratch where it itches.” Perhaps her most famous quote was during a White House dinner in 1965, “If you haven’t got anything good to say about anybody, come sit next to me.”

Click BOOKS for more by historical writer Paul Andrews
Home » Blog

How Saint Paul spread Christianity in the Roman Empire

Saint Paul (Saul of Tarsus) statue in front of St. Peters Basilica in the Vatican
Saint Paul (Saul of Tarsus) statue in front of St. Peters Basilica in the Vatican

Saint Paul is one of the most central figures in the religious history of the western world. Following his conversion from Judaism to Christianity, he travelled tens of thousands of miles around the Mediterranean Sea. During four, long missionary journeys, he spread the teachings of Jesus of Nazareth.  It was Saint Paul who planted the seeds and turned Christianity from a small Palestinian sect into a worldwide faith, open to all people.

His written works are some of the earliest Christian documents, 13 of the 27 books of the New Testament. What we know about Saint Paul comes mainly from two Biblical sources, the Acts of the Apostles, written after Paul’s death, likely by the same author as Luke’s gospel. The second source is Saint Paul’s own letters (Epistles) to his followers.  But who was this man who first persecuted Christians, then would become one its greatest disciples?

Paul was born Saul somewhere between 5 BC and 5 AD in Tarsus, on the coast of modern-day southern Turkey.  Though a Jew, Saul was also born a Roman citizen, which came with certain privileges in the vast empire.  Like his father, he became a successful tent maker by trade.  Saul was born to a staunchly Jewish family well known in their community. His family was well off as they could send him off to be educated in Jerusalem.  There he became an avid student.  Saul later described himself before his conversion as “of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of Hebrews; as to the law, a Pharisee; as to zeal, a persecutor.” (Philippians 3).

As a Roman citizen, he knew both Greek and Latin. Like many Jews of that time, he had a second Greco-Latin name, Paul. Stubborn and bold, Saul became a skilled debater. As a Pharisee, he was among the first Jews to widely persecute Christians.  He considered them a dangerous, subversive sect needing to be overthrown. Saul “sought to destroy the Church: he went into the houses, took men and women, and put them in prison” (Acts 8).

In the Acts of the Apostles, he is mentioned for the first time during the stoning of the disciple Stephen in Jerusalem – the first Christian martyr. As a persecutor of the church, Saul had authority over and approval of the stoning. His intense zeal for this work was widely known, so he was reviled by the early Christians. The disciples of Jesus also feared and ran from him.

The early followers of Jesus were still devout Jews who continued to observe Jewish Law. But they were still a small sect within Judaism.  So Paul attempted to snuff out this fledgling movement before it could spread and do much damage. After the stoning of Stephen, Saul was authorized by the high priest to execute the fugitives in Jerusalem. He would travel wherever he could to stomp out the young Christian religion.

He had never listened to or met Jesus while was alive.  Around 37 AD, Saul was on his way to Damascus on an assignment to persecute Christians there.  Suddenly, a heavenly light shone on him.  Falling to the ground, he heard a voice from above saying, ‘Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?’ Saul responded, ‘Who are you, Lord?’ The voice answered, ‘I am Jesus, whom you persecute.  Now get up and go into the city.’ (Acts 9).  Saul looked up and saw a vision of the risen Jesus in the light.

Saul was temporarily blinded and the event would change his life completely. He was escorted by his fellow travelers to Damascus blind, where for three days, he neither ate nor drank.  A disciple in Damascus named Arnanias baptized Saul as Paul, and his vision was immediately restored.

Paul then met with the small Christian community in the city and testified to what happened to him on the road. He stayed with the disciples in Damascus and began to preach with enthusiasm in the synagogues.  Instead of flushing out Christians, he had now become one! Pharisees now sought out to kill Paul for preaching Christianity instead of persecuting it. He had to flee Damascus and went to Jerusalem.

There, he met Simon Peter and the other Apostles, who looked upon him with great skepticism and mistrust.  In the end though, Peter accepted this new zeal as bestowed by Christ and welcomed him. Paul listened to the Apostles and learned the teachings of Jesus. He left Jerusalem a fervent disciple and returned to Tarsus.  There he devoted himself to evangelizing both Jews and pagans, referred to in the Bible as ‘Gentiles.

Saul’s earlier passion for persecuting Christians turned into an even greater fervence to spread the gospel across the Mediterranean. Paul earned his own living wherever he went. Luke says that he was a tentmaker and Paul often talks about how he combined his preaching with working with his hands.

Around 46 AD, the Christian church in Syrian Antioch chose Paul and another disciple, Barnabas, to proclaim the gospel throughout Galatia (modern Turkey). This would become Paul 1st great missionary Journey.

The pair sailed to the island of Cyprus, where the Bible notes that he confronted a sorcerer preaching the devil’s work, one of many confrontations to follow.  They then sailed to the mainland and travelled to Pisidian Antioch, in present day central Turkey, preaching the gospel of Jesus.  The pair travelled to Iconium and Lystra, where Paul performed a miracle, healing a man crippled since birth.  They then returned to Syrian Antioch via Perga. The journey would last two years.

When they stopped in each city, Paul went to the synagogues to preach the teachings of Jesus to Jews, proclaiming him the Messiah and the fulfillment of the Old Testament. In each location he also converted Gentiles to followers of Christianity and founded small churches in each community. The people there were typically Greco-Romans or pagan-druids who worshiped multiple gods. He returned to Jerusalem excited to discuss their journey with Peter and the Apostles.

Paul’s second journey begins around 51 AD.   Barnabas and Paul had a falling out over which disciple should accompany them, and the men parted ways.  Paul travels on foot across Galatia with the disciple Silas (Silvanus), revisiting the churches he founded in Lystra and Iconium.   On this trip, Paul has a dream where Jesus calls to him to go even further and bring the gospel to Macedonia and Greece. So they sailed across the Aegean Sea next.

Here the pair traveled down the east coast of Greece, preaching about Jesus in Thessalonia and Phillipi, where they were briefly imprisoned in chains. Paul attempted to proclaim the gospel in Athens, but was rebuffed by the Greeks. He then went to Corinth where they stayed for a year, establishing a larger church there. He traveling back through Ephesus on the Turkish coast, before sailing back to Jerusalem, then returning to Syrian Antioch. This second, longer journey would last three years.

This was a pastoral journey revisiting the small churches he had founded to strengthen them, grow their congregations, and give them further instruction. He retraced his prior land trip across Galatia, spending three years establishing a church at Ephesus.  While in Ephesus, Paul heard a prophecy that should he return to Jerusalem, he would be imprisoned by the Jews. His Ephesian followers pleaded with him not to go. Peter would not be dissuaded.

From there they crossed the Aegean Sea once again, returning to Macedonia, Thessalonia and Corinth, visiting the communities that had previously welcomed him. It was during this 3rd missionary journey that Paul cemented many of the churches he would later write epistles to. He returned again to Jerusalem four years later. 

The four missionary journeys of Saint Paul.
The four missionary journeys of Saint Paul.

While he was gone, tensions had developed between the Gentile-Christians he had founded and the Judeo-Christians of Palestine following Peter.  Peter, who at first freely ate with Gentiles, later withdrew from contact with them. Paul did not shy away from taking Peter to task for it. They two men disagreed face to face over the demands that Gentiles follow certain rules of Jewish law.  Paul argued with Peter about the foolishness of not accepting the Gentiles because of this.

I opposed him to his face, because he was clearly in the wrong.  If you, though a Jew, live like a Gentile (by following Jesus), how can you force the Gentiles to live like Jews?” (Galatians 2).

Paul’s ministry was particularly punishing on him and marked with other conflicts and several imprisonments in the cities he traveled and preached to. He argued with Gentiles who opposed the impact his preaching their business trade. Paul also had conflicts with new Christian leaders who neglected to abide by ALL Christian principles and only cherry-picked the ones that pleased them.

Paul fell back on his Roman citizenship on several occasions to alleviate his most dire situations. The first was when Paul and Silas were beaten for preaching as Christians in Philippi. The second was in Jerusalem, where Paul was to be flogged by Roman soldiers after daring to preach in the temple. The third time was in Caesarea, when Paul was on trial before the Roman governor Festus. He was accused by the Jews of preaching against Jewish law.  They had him arrested (as prophesized in Ephesus) and held in prison for 2 years in Caesarea.

The emperor had him transferred to Rome, thus beginning his 4th great journey. Along the way, he healed the father of the governor of Malta who was suffering from fever.  In Rome, he was placed under house arrest for 2 more years. It was in the Roman capitol, where church leaders say Peter found him, and Paul met the fledgling Christian community there. The charges against him were dismissed, after which Paul continued his 4th missionary journey in Rome itself.

Paul was arrested one final time by the infamous Emperor Nero. This time, for converting Romans to Christianity and daring to proclaim Christ king, not the emperor.  Nero blamed the burning of Rome on the Christians and a Roman court condemned Paul to execution. The Bible does not record Paul’s death, but tradition holds that he was executed on the Aqueas Salviae sometime around 68 AD.  As a Roman citizen, he was beheaded rather than crucified.

Though there is no mention in the Bible of Paul and Peter meeting in Rome, Christian tradition holds that they were imprisoned together and embraced on the Via Osteinse before being led to their respective executions.  One can only imagine their last poignant words together. Legend has it that the Apostle Peter was crucified, upside down at his own request, on Vatican Hill. The Basilica of St. Peter and the Basilica of St. Paul stand over what is believed to be their respective tombs.


During his later journeys, Saint Paul wrote some of the most eloquent passages in the Bible (1 Corinthians 13). He became the first great Christian theologian, establishing some of the building blocks of the church that Christians now take for granted. Paul contributed much to how Christianity understands the relationship between the Old and New Testament.

In his letters, Saint Paul frets about who will defend the status of his converts. Paul also often berates his followers for backsliding and doubting Jesus. Theologians have come up with a picture of Paul as a zealous preacher who was quick to defend the honor of Christians, but who also demanded loyalty to the faith. “Patiently correct, rebuke and encourage your people with good teachings.” (Timothy 2)

There is little doubt that Saint Paul’s four missionary journeys changed the course of Christianity. Paul expanded the church far and wide, reinforcing it amongst Jews, opening doors to Gentiles, all the while fighting zealously for his conviction that the gospel was for ALL peoples and that NO barriers should be put in their way.

Considering that he was not one of the twelve apostles, and therefore not an eyewitness to Jesus’ ministry on Earth, it is amazing that Saint Paul made the permanent mark on Christianity that he did. His life, letters, and legacy certainly suggest divine intervention that reverberates through the millennia to this day.

Click BOOKS for more by historical writer, Paul Andrews
Home » Blog

Smallpox and the American Revolution

Continental Army defeat at Quebec during the Revolutionary War Smallpox epidemic, 1776
Continental Army’s defeat at Quebec during the Revolutionary War smallpox epidemic, 1776

During the 1700’s, smallpox epidemics raged throughout the American colonies. They would severely impact the new Continental Army during the Revolutionary War.  The first signs came during the early battles of the American Revolution in 1775-1776 – at the siege of Boston, the siege of Quebec, and Britain’s Virginia regiments.  These deadly outbreaks pushed Washington and his medical staff to make crucial decisions regarding smallpox control. He ordered all Continental soldiers to be inoculated in 1777.  Historians credit this mandate with the colonists’ ultimate victory in the Revolutionary War for Independence.

Throughout history, smallpox epidemics sparked panic amongst the population. Before vaccinations began in 1796, people had very few ways to protect themselves. For many, the disease proved fatal. Small pox is caused by the contagious variola virus. It typically spread by infection of the respiratory tract. The initial signs came 12 days after exposure. Early symptoms were flu-like with fever, headache, body aches, vomiting and malaise.  By Day 4, the face flushed and the first painful pox appeared – not on the skin, but in the mouth and throat. Eating and drinking became painful. The next day, the dreaded skin rash began.

Pustules then erupted on the skin in a pox.  If the pustules became confluent, 60% of patients died. Around Day 10, the pustules turned blistery and cracked open, releasing a foul stench. For survivors, near the end of the second week, scabs formed.  If you survived to week 3, the fever subsided and patients were left with unsightly scars replacing the poxes. Survivors were now strangely blessed though. Having endured the disease, they were now immune.

With every outbreak, those who survived the disease rarely got smallpox again. This observation led to the advent of inoculation, the process of contracting smallpox on purpose to induce future immunity. A doctor removed pus from an active pox of an infected person and inserted it into the hand skin of a non-infected person. The insertion resulted in the inoculated person contracting smallpox but with only mild symptoms.

Smallpox was rampant in crowded European cities. Most people did not make it through childhood without contracting the disease. Thanks to widespread inoculation, most gained immunity, including the British military. The disease spread across Europe and into America, thanks to English and Spanish colonization.  Because most American colonists lived in isolated villages, few were inoculated, so the colonies experienced sporadic epidemics. It would devastate the Native American populations as well

Inoculated individuals did contract smallpox, and were fully capable of infecting others. So they should be quarantined lest they spread the disease. For this reason, inoculation was highly controversial in the colonies. Many believed the procedure was more deadly than the disease. In England, where smallpox had long been endemic, the procedure was widely accepted. This meant that at the beginning of the American Revolution, the British forces had the advantage.

This brings us to the War for Independence.  During the 1760s, Dr. Joseph Warren operated a smallpox inoculation clinic on Castle Island in Boston Harbor.  There he inoculated future President John Adams, amongst other Sons of Liberty. Abigail Adams later inoculated herself and her children against the disease.

Despite inoculations, a smallpox epidemic seized Boston in 1775. After the Battle of Bunker Hill, smallpox was gripping the citizens of Boston and General Howe’s Redcoats. The Continental Army was entrenched around the city. General George Washington knew from his medical advisors that his Continental soldiers were not immune to smallpox and would be devastated by the outbreak.  

Teenage smallpox disease victim.
Teenage smallpox disease victim.

Washington also had to contend with a sizeable exodus of refugees from the stricken city. Colonial spies reported that General Howe was deliberately infecting fleeing refugees with an intent to spread the disease among the rebels.  Washington banned the refugees entering from the American army camps. He ordered any soldier showing ‘the least symptoms of Smallpox’ to be immediately quarantined.

 In March 1776, 250 years ago, General Howe and the British army abandoned Boston.  Despite this victory for the colonists, Washington forbade his troops from entering the city because of the epidemic. He permitted only one thousand men who had previously contracted smallpox to enter and retake the city. Washington ordered that no one susceptible could enter; no one with visible symptoms could leave. Finally, by autumn, the epidemic waned.

In 1775, Continental soldiers, led by Colonel Benedict Arnold, marched towards Quebec to prevent the British from taking the city. In December, the first case of smallpox was reported among his soldiers. It crippled the American forces in Canada, preventing them from launching an attack. Many soldiers told their superiors they would NOT re-enlist due to fear of the disease. They would rather desert the revolutionary cause than risk death by the dreaded smallpox.

This forced General Richard Montgomery to attempt an assault on Quebec in the winter. Only about 800 men were able to fight, as the rest were sick with the pox, resulting in a crushing failure. British forces killed Montgomery, wounded Arnold, and captured hundreds of rebels. Benedict Arnold managed to maintain forces around Quebec, however, the lack of reinforcements due to smallpox prevented any future attack.

Wanting protection from the disease, fearful soldiers began inoculating themselves! These men failed to quarantine however, and instead spread the disease further amongst their fellow soldiers.  Arnold forbade self-inoculation by penalty of death to prevent its rampant spread.

In March 1776, Major General John Thomas took control of the forces in Canada. Thomas refused to allow any inoculations. He felt the soldiers would not have enough time to recuperate in quarantine for a British attack. Thomas also refused to be inoculated himself to show solidarity with the his men. He contracted the disease and died from it.

It was apparent that smallpox, rather than British might or Continental Army inadequacy, was the reason for the Army’s defeat in Canada.” – John Adams

After a miserable, five-month siege of Quebec, 1,500 Americans retreated up the St Lawrence River. The men struggled through knee-deep snow. While quarantine had worked at Boston, it failed at Quebec. Half of the retreating troops were sick with the pox. One soldier wrote: ‘My pocks had become so sore and troublesome, that my clothes stuck fast to my body, especially my feet; and it became a severe trial to my fortitude to bear my disorder.’

When reinforcements finally arrived, they were terrifying by the scenes that greeted them, and quickly succumbed as well. ‘My eyes never before beheld such a seen’, wrote John Lacey of Pennsylvania, ‘nor do I ever desire to see such another – I did not look into a tent in which I did not find either a dead or dying man.’ Two mass graves consumed thirty to forty bodies a day.

General Philip Schuyler wrote to George Washington, warning him that further reinforcements would rather weaken than strengthen their Army unless inoculated. It is likely that smallpox killed roughly a thousand men during the Canadian campaign. Returning soldiers then instigated further outbreaks in New England, New York, and Pennsylvania.

Finding the smallpox to be spreading much, I have determined that the Troops shall be inoculated. For should the disorder rage with its usual Virulence, we should have more to dread from it, than from the sword of the enemy.” – George Washington.

With this order, Washington enacted the first medical mandate in American history. Washington ordered that all troops and all new recruits must be inoculated. The military used private homes and churches as isolation centers to control spread of the disease during their quarantine.

Washington took a huge risk with these mass inoculations. If the British found out, they could have launched an attack on the weakened Continental Army. Therefore, it had to be kept secret. Though gaining support across each colony was difficult, as fear of smallpox ran rampant, mandated inoculations proved successful.

Revolutionary War Continental Army during the winter of 1777.
Revolutionary War Continental Army during the winter of 1777

By 1777, the procedure was established in the Continental Army, and prevalence of the disease was greatly reduced.  With smallpox diminished, the Continental Army even saw a surge of new recruits in 1777.

To the south, in the colony of Virginia, the royal governor, Lord John Murray, had promised freedom to all “slaves belonging to Rebels” who would fight for the king. At least 900 African-Americans joined Dunmore, donning uniforms and fighting in several skirmishes. But smallpox would turn out to to be their worst enemy. In February 1776, smallpox appeared in Dunmore’s troops near Portsmouth, Virginia. By May, over 300 had died and he  lost more of his black regiment every day.

In July, now under attack by Virginia rebels, Dunmore was forced to give up the island. Virginians who arrived were appalled at the scene. “We were struck with horrour at the number of dead slave bodies, in a state of putrefaction, strewed all the way from their battery to the point, about two miles in length.

They found others gasping for life. Some had crawled to the water’s edge to cool their fevers. In all, some 500 slaves died on the island. As in Canada, rebel soldiers carried smallpox with them, sparking more outbreaks in Virginia and Maryland. In 1778, the disease seemed to have faded away in the army thanks to Washington’s orders. Continuing through the year, the American forces went through inoculation and quarantine at West Point, Valley Forge, Alexandria, and Fairfax. 

In 1779, as the theatre of war moved further south, so did smallpox. In early 1779, a British force of Hessian troops carried it through the southern colonies. Smallpox erupted in Charleston and Savannah and plagued the south for two more years. Particularly hard hit were the slaves who fled to promised freedom in General Cornwallis’ Redcoat army. This time, the British turned on the infected African Americans and forced them to return to their masters, in an attempt to spread smallpox to the American army.

As the Revolutionary War reshaped colonial America on the east coast, a very different upheaval shook the entire North American continent. In 1779, the virus moved westwards from the colonies, finding vast susceptible populations of frontier colonists and Native Americans. Trade and colonial expansion joined the army in transporting the disease. In 1779, smallpox had travelled via the Spanish Catholic missions and struck Mexico City, afflicting 44,000 and killing 18,000.

In a description of smallpox among the Narragansetts ‘They lie on their hard matts, the pox breaking and running one into another, their skin cleaving to the matts they lie on; when they turn them, a whole side of skin will fall off at once.

Smallpox launched a simultaneous attack on the plains territory by way of the Comanches, who engaged in trade with the Shoshone in Wyoming and Montana. Before long the disease appeared among the Iroquois, Cree and Blackfeet.  The Shoshones transmitted the plague to the tribes of the upper Missouri River. The Sioux marauders contracted it during their assaults on those Missouri villages. The disease decimated the indigenous tribes.

While smallpox on the southern and northern plains began to wane, the epidemic, did not. Smallpox reached the northwest Pacific coast, most likely from Shoshone nomads following native trade routes down the Columbia River to the ocean.  References to abandoned villages and smallpox-scarred natives can be found on different British voyages to the Pacific northwest.


From 1775 to 1782, revolutionary upheaval rocked the east coast, while smallpox wreaked its havoc from the colonies to the plains to the Pacific. From Mexico to Hudson Bay, the continent was alive with trade and tribes, and the smallpox virus followed them all and left decimated populations behind.

Cruising the northwest coastline of America in 1792, Captain George Vancouver wondered, where were all the natives? The land and sea were abundant with an unlimited supply of food, but there were few people. Instead, they found abandoned villages scattered with human skulls and bones. The conclusion was inescapable: ‘By some event, this country has been considerably depopulated!’

Nevertheless, despite the smallpox surge and the pandemic tragedy, America survived.  Without the bravery and determination of 18th century doctors, inoculation and quarantines may have never gained widespread acceptance in the new United States.  And without General George Washington’s decisive and unpopular inoculations, the American colonists may never have won the Revolutionary War against Britain and achieved their independence.  

Click BOOKS for more by historical writer Paul Andrews.
Home » Blog

The Great Bengal Famine and the Boston Tea Party

Sketch of of Bengali family during the Great Bengal Famine, 1770
Depiction of a starving family during the Great Bengal Famine.

The Indian Famine of 1770 is one of the greatest disasters in human history. Over ten million people, a third of the population of Bengal, died.  A drought lasting 5 years, bad harvests, and cruel British rule all contributed. The British East India Company compounded the famine with heavy taxation, leading to millions of Bengalis unable to buy food and starving to death. The Bengal Famine had a ripple effect far beyond India. When accounts of the terrible famine reached the American colonies, they helped instigate the Boston Tea Party.

There was, in fact, more to the Boston Tea Party than just anger over tea taxes. News of the Bengal Famine fostered distrust and outrage towards the British Parliament and the East India Company. Boston’s reaction was particularly acute, escalating rebel anger and culminating in the Boston Tea Party of 1773.

The East India Company was a private British firm that ruled most of India from 1757 to 1858, when control was transferred to the British government. In 1764, after a military victory over the Mughals, the Company won control of Bengal (including present-day Bangladesh).  This included the right to levy taxes on the Indian population.  The East India Company attained the right to collect the peasant’s tribute (diwani) formally given to the Mughal Emperor. This tribute had been about 10-15% of the output of the peasant farmers.

These collectors were rewarded with handsome percentages and bonuses for meeting their goals. The Company raised that rate to 40 to 50%. In addition, they outlawed the storage of rice and other foods. India regularly experienced droughts, so storage of reserves was a standard practice amongst villages and families. The Company however wanted to their maximize profits, so they outlawed this “peasant hoarding.”

When drought began in 1769, it produced famine conditions, risking starvation amongst the Bengal population. What was the governing Company’s response? The East India Company, chaired by Sir George Colebrooke, was not satisfied with merely maintaining revenues from the Indian peasants with millions facing starvation. They wanted more.

It raised the taxes again to 60%, and resorted to violence to collect them.  The Company imposed a yearly quota that tax collectors must reach—no matter what. This placed an impossible burden on the poor Bengali population.  Now Bengali families no longer had money to pay for food when their crops failed with reserves outlawed.  Famine-related starvation began.

Tax collectors, not wanting to loose their bonuses, employed violence on the population, curtesy of the occupying British Redcoats, to “compel” the Bengalis to pay. As a result, most families, after having been forced to pay the taxes at gunpoint, had dry farmland unable to grow food, and no money left to buy it. Starvation of men, women, children, elderly – it mattered not to the Company directors.

The most died of starvation in 1770 when the worst of the taxes reigned.  Indians knew that the root cause was not the drought, but the cruel taxation of the British occupiers, and deep hated was planted. With each Indian death came less tax revenue for the Company sucked from the Bengali population.  This economic shortfall would have an unexpected ripple effect in of all places – the American colonies.

“On our arrival here, we found a river full of dead human carcasses floating downstream. The streets crowded with the dead and dying, without anyone attempting to give them relief.  So horribly has the famine raged here, that those who were able to procure food were so accustomed to see their fellow creatures perish, that it did not even create a painful emotion. The numbers that have perished in Calcutta alone amounted to 10,000 to 12,000 a week. 

Every morning the dead were just gathered together in a heap and thrown into the river. I have myself passed by and seen 20 or 30 lain down to die in the length of one street. It was no uncommon sight to see dogs running about with human limbs in their jaws. I have beheld the hapless infant tugging at the empty breast of its mother just expiring, without being capable of affording them the smallest aid. ”

The now financially-struggling Company influenced the British Parliament to pass the Tea Act in 1773, allowing direct shipment of its Indian tea to the American colonies. The company could now bring tea to America duty-free, with the taxes paid by the colonists. Its design was to grant the company an American monopoly on tea, and enable it to gain greater profits from the trade.

A series of angry pamphlets, entitled “The Alarm,” were circulated in Boston in 1773.  They told of the Bengal Famine and called for refusing to accept the tea brought by the Company. “Rusticus” writes,

“Are we to be given up to the East India Company to step forth in Aid of the Prime Minister, to execute his Plan, of enslaving America? Their Conduct in Asia for some Years past, has given simple Proof, how little they regard the Rights, Liberties or Lives of Men for the Sake of Gain. And these not being sufficient to glut their Avarice, they have, by the most unparalleled Barbarities and Extortions, reduced whole Provinces to Ruin.

Fifteen hundred Thousand perished by Famine in one Year, not because the Earth denied its Fruits; but because this Company engulfed their Necessaries of Life, and set taxes so high that the poor could not purchase them. Thus having drained the Sources of the immense Wealth from India they now cast their Eyes on America.”

“Rusticus” put the issue before his fellow Americans: the East India Company had just starved to death millions in Indian people for the sake of profit and greed.  They controlled the British government with repeated bribes, and now they have their sights set on America. This injustice led to the Boston Tea Party in December 1773.

iction of the Boston Tea Party, December 1773
Depiction of the Boston Tea Party, December 1773

In December 1773, several Company ships carrying tea arrived in Boston harbor.  The colonists refused to pay taxes or allow the tea to be unloaded. The British Governor ordered the tea tariff to be paid regardless.  That night, over 100 colonists emptied 45 tons of Company tea into Boston Harbor. The first Continental Congress was convened the next year in 1774.  The American Revolution began at Lexington and Concord in 1775, and the Declaration of Independence a year later in Philadelphia.

As for the Indian Bengal Famine, below is an excerpt of a letter with a rather gruesome account from someone present at the time, published in the New-York Literary Magazine.

“Great dearth has desolated the provinces of this beautiful country. Hardly any rain has fallen during four years. In consequence the crops have failed, and the poor starved. From my enquiries, I find half of the inhabitants of the Duab have perished. Every ditch, road, brook, pond, and street were strewed with dead bodies of men, women, and children. Where the wretch expires, there he lies, till his flesh is stripped off by the dogs. No one tends to the dead; for their friends are starved wretches as well.

The Hindoos do not bury their dead, but burn them. We have been often obliged to shift our camp on account of the stench, arising from the putrefaction of so many bodies.  Men and women, with their children in their hands, flocked to camp, offering themselves for sale for a quart of corn. Mothers sold their children for the fourth part of a rupee. I could have purchased a thousand children at this price.

These poor wretches were reduced to this hard alternative. You, in England are astonished, no doubt, to hear of dogs devouring dead bodies.  Wise nature has so ordered, that this hot country abounds with these dogs, called parriars. They go up and down the streets seeking dead carcasses, which they devour, whether of horses, sheep, or men. I have seen hundreds of bodies with two or three dogs tugging the limbs to pieces.”

The exact number is unknown since counting in rural and remote areas was ignored. What is known from accounts of British administrators is that the social upheavals were widespread. A Kali religious revival followed, reaffirming a religious identity suppressed by the Company. The terrifying Goddess Kali became a symbol of Indian, anti-British resistance well into the 19th and 20th centuries. Kali had become the Goddess of Indian protest against the cruel British rule.

Famines are preventable if there is a serious societal effort to confront them, lead by a democratic government with an independent press. Not surprisingly, while India continued to have droughts and famines under its oppressive British colonial rule, widespread famines stopped after it achieved independence 180 years later, in 1947.

What caused the 1770 famine? The continued raising of taxes by the Company, together with the drought and indifference of the British occupiers, resulted in the deaths of ten million Bengalis. Some historians call it a genocide, though not one cause by guns or gases. The Great Bengal Famine reminds us that unequitable treatment and unchecked greed can have destructive societal power when used to deny basic freedoms and access to justice … and incite others to rebellion and revolution.

Home » Blog