Napoleon’s Failed Invasion of Russia

Napoleon's French Troops freezing in the Russian Winter on 1812
Napoleon’s French Troops freezing in the Russian Winter on 1812

French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte was without a doubt one of the most brilliant leaders in history.  Nevertheless, his Invasion of Russia in 1812 was one of the worst military disasters ever undertaken.  Much like Adolf Hitler’s failed attempt over a century later, it would be a turning point in his ultimate downfall and the defeat of his country in war. So how did things go so terribly wrong for Napoleon and the French Army?

Following the French Revolution, Napoleon took power over the new French Republic in 1799 as First Consul.  In 1804, he was elected Emperor by referendum and crowned himself and his wife, Josephine, in Notre Dame Cathedral.  He then won a string of brilliant military victories in the subsequent Wars of Coalition against Britain, Prussia, Austria, and Spain.  France annexed Belgium and Holland, along with large swathes of Italy and Prussia.  He set up satellite dependencies in Spain and Poland. After 5 coalition wars, Austria, Prussia and Russia had been browbeaten by Napoleon into becoming his allies.

Only Great Britain remained defiantly outside of Napoleon’s iron grasp. 

In 1806, Napoleon attacked Britain economically by instituting a strict trade embargo by nearly all of Europe known as “The Continental System.” But by the beginning of 1811, Russian Czar Alexander I had stopped complying and was instead trading with France’s sworn enemy, Britain!  The embargo was having a harmful effect on Russian trade and its own economy. Czar Alexander had also imposed a heavy tax on French products in order to raise revenue.  Finally, he rebuffed Napoleon’s desire that he marry one of his sisters.  Tensions escalated and every attempt to negotiate failed.

Napoleon had created the Duchy of Warsaw from Prussian lands. Czar Alexander worried it would incite Polish nationalism against his empire.  The Russian army started to concentrate its military forces on the border. Napoleon went to the Russian ambassador in Paris, and harshly rebuked him: “You know it’s easy to start a war, but it’s very difficult to finish one.” Napoleon had never considered Russia a  threat.  But now, he decided to teach Czar Alexander a lesson. He would invade Russia first.

Preparations began in January 1811. Napoleon gathered together his Grande Armée, consisting of roughly 650,000 soldiers including Frenchmen and conscripted Austrians, Poles and Prussians. Then he moved them all into Poland, along Russia’s border.  The French forces were far greater than anything that Europe had ever seen. It was truly a European army, comprising mixed languages and cultures, the most diverse since the Crusades. ALL decisions were made by Napoleon himself, with implementation delegated to his officers.

Emperor Napoleon presented the invasion to the French people in grand terms. Its noble goal was to the destroy the Russian threat to Europe. They must be punished for leaving the French continental blockade and daring to side with their enemy Britain. He’d simply flood enough men east to quickly force the Russians to engage in battle, overwhelming and defeating them. Napoleon fully expected the Czar to surrender in 20 days after the first major battle.

French Emperor Napoleon and Russian Czar Alexander
French Emperor Napoleon and Russian Czar Alexander

In May 1812, Napoleon arrived in Poland and took personal command of his Grande Armée. 

Ignoring the advice of his closest advisors, in June the army crossed the Niemen River into Russian territory. They would fight approximately 200,000 soldiers on the Russian side. Napoleon’s goal was to win a quick victory that forced Czar Alexander to the negotiating table.

Instead, the Russian army pulled back! They let the Grande Armée capture the city of Vilna in a week with barely a fight. Napoleon remained confident. “I have come once and for all to finish off these barbarians of the North.  They must be pushed back into their ice, so that they no longer come to busy themselves with the affairs of civilized Europe.”

In July, the Russian army similarly withdrew and abandoned Vitebsk. They set fire to military storehouses and bridges as they left. In August, they retreated as well from Smolensk, and torched the city to the ground. Peasant farmers were ordered to burn their crops to prevent them from falling into the hands of French troops. This “SCORCHED EARTH” tactic was incredibly effective in denying the French army a food source. The summer had also become oppressively hot.  The Grande Armée soldiers were coming down with deadly diseases like typhus and cholera.

Napoleon’s troops trudged along regardless, deeper into Russia’s vast territory. The Emperor had hoped to defeat his enemy quickly, but the Russians would not give battle.  He had an army twice the size of the Russia, but it did not matter.  The Russians continued to retreat, drawing him deeper and deeper into Russia. Companies of Cossacks would ride in to hack at Napoleon’s rear and flanks, then gallop away into the hills. 

As the weeks turned into months, the hot Russian summer took its toll on the men.

The Grande Armée soldiers fell out from sickness, exhaustion, and finally mass desertion — more than 5,000 a day. After two months, 150,000 soldiers were out of action without a single battle fought. A lot of the foreign troops just abandoned their lines. They weren’t Frenchmen, after all, and weren’t loyal to Napoleon. They were fighting simply because their kings had ordered them too.

In September, the Russians finally made a stand at the Battle of Borodino, just 75 miles from Moscow. Moscow, the holy city of Russia, was now at stake. The soldiers of the Czar finally stood their ground and prepared for battle. They chanted, “‘Tis the will of God! Tis the will of God!” They were prepared to die for Russia.

Napoleon threw his entire army at the Russians lines in a massive frontal assault. It was a wild attack for the usually strategic leader, and it was horrific. The Grande Armée and Russians pounded each other with artillery. Then they launched charges and countercharges.  The battle began at 6:30 in the morning and lasted until 3 in the afternoon. The Russians managed to fight the French army to a standstill. The losses on both sides were enormous, with at least 70,000 combined casualties.

Rather than fighting a second day, the Russians withdrew again and left Moscow to the French. Napoleon could finally declare a victory! He found Moscow mostly abandoned, emptied by the Russian army, and burning.  He said of it, “Mountains of red, rolling flames, like immense waves of the sea. Oh, it was the most grand, the most sublime, and the most terrifying sight the world ever beheld.” Napoleon gained a strategic city, but at a very high cost.   Then he waited … but still the Czar refused to negotiate a treaty. 

Finally, the first snow flurries of winter began to fall.   

Now finally Napoleon finally realized the error of his ways.  The increasing cold ultimately forced the French to retreat from Moscow, less than a month after occupying it. They could NOT survive the winter there.  The Russian winter began to further decimate his Grande Armée. By October, Napoleon was down to some 150,000 troops, the rest having died in battle, wounded and left behind in Moscow, or simply deserted.

They could not take a planned southerly retreat to quicker warmth. His troops were forced further north by the Russian army at Maloyaroslavets.  When the Grande Armée arrived back at Smolensk, they found that stragglers had eaten the food supplies they had left there. Their horses were freezing to death and dying in droves, only to be eaten by the desperate starving troops.  There was near constant desertion and attrition. Napoleon finally realized his invasion was an unmistakable disaster.  He ordered a full, humiliating retreat back to Poland.

By November, the Russian winter had set in with sub-zero temperatures, high winds, and waves of deep snow. On the worst nights, thousands of soldiers would succumb to exposure. Desperate men split open dead animals and crawled inside for warmth.  Or they stacked the dead bodies of their comrades in windows for insulation.  In December, Napoleon was told rumors of a coup attempt back in Paris. He left the army under the command of Joachim Murat and sped for France.

French Emperor Napoleon and Russian Czar Alexander
Napoleon and his Grande Armee retreating from the Invasion of Russia in 1812.

The remains of the Grande Armée stumbled back across the Niemen River into Poland.

Napoleon’s aura of invincibility was finally shattered and his vulnerability exposed to all of Europe. His reluctant allies, Prussia and Austria, quickly abandoned him. In Paris, a conspiracy led by the General Malet threatened to overthrow him, as he had spread news of Napoleon’s death in Russia.

In early 1813, Prussia broke from its alliance with Napoleon and joined Russia against him. Northern Germany rose against him as well. Austria then broke with the French alliance. France was forced to evacuate Madrid. Emboldened by the defeat, Austria, Prussia and Sweden joined Russia and Great Britain in the fight against Napoleon Bonaparte. In the time of a year, all Europe was now united against Napoleon.

Although he still had his old expertise and daring, Napoleon’s cause was lost. The ‘Battle of the Nations’ at Leipzig in October 1813 was the end. Napoleon lost and retreated from the German states. Britain’s Duke of Wellington was advancing north through Spain, so France was now forced to fight on two fronts. The Allies crossed the Rhine in January 1814 and Italy abandoned him as well. Napoleon stubbornly refused all offers of treaties.

French generals surrendered Paris to Wellington and the Allies in March. Emperor Napoleon was forced to abdicate unconditionally in April 1814. His wife and family were placed in the custody of Emperor Francis I in Vienna, Austria. Louis XVIII became king of a France, with its border restored to pre-Napoleonic frontiers.

Napoleon was exiled to the Mediterranean island of Elba.

The Treaty of Paris, which restored France to its 1792 borders, was surprisingly mild. Instead of carving up France amongst themselves, the monarchs of Europe wanted a stable, royal France to return. The clear winner was Britain.  With its dominance of the seas, global colonial empire, and industrial economy, the British Empire emerged on top of Europe and the world for the next 100 years.

Napoleon’s 1812 Invasion of Russia has become a synonymous with autocratic overreaching power, or if you prefer a cliché, biting off more than you can chew. Like Charles XII of Sweden before him in 1707, and Adolf Hitler in the 1940’s, Napoleon Bonaparte faced deadly failure in the vast frozen expanse of the Russian Empire.

In 1815, Napoleon managed to escape exile and seized control of a still loyal French Army.  He made one more attempt to take power, but it would last only 100 days.  He was overcome by British, Dutch and Prussian troops, led by the Duke of Wellington, at the famous Battle of Waterloo in Belgium.  He abdicated again and this time was exiled by the British to the island of Saint Helene off the southwestern coast of Africa.  He died there alone and frustrated six years later in 1821 of a stomach ulcer … at the age of only 51.

As with the Nazi’s attempt a century later, Napoleon was doomed from the start. He was logistically incapable of succeeding before his troops took one step into Russia. Napoleon believed, like Hitler later, that defeated Russian generals would surrender, seeking an immediate truce. Czar Alexander, like Josef Stalin later, denied them any surrender. They instead withdrew into Russia’s vast territory. In a desperate attempt to win, both the French and Nazis marched deeper and deeper into enemy territory.  Until the brutal Russian winter arrived.

Napoleon’s, and later Hitler’s, invasion of Russia symbolizes what happens when one autocratic leader avoids the advice of his own generals and launches a war outside its abilities to succeed. If we could only LEARN from the lessons of the past. Then perhaps we could have avoided subsequent wars in Korea, Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan. History is nothing if not an excellent teacher. The wars waged against today’s threats will not be short incursions into weak enemies. They will rather be sustained and costly conflicts incurring thousands civilian casualties. 

Much like the wars in Ukraine and Gaza today.
For more by historical writer Paul Andrews, click BOOKS.

LOST IN HISTORY menu
Home » Blog » Page 10

Israel vs. Middle East -the Birth Pains of a new Nation

The Israeli Defense Force raises the new flag of Israel in 1949

Israel as a nation has only existed since 1948, less than a hundred years.  It was created by the United Nations in the aftermath of World War II. The Jewish kingdom of Israel has been around since Biblical Old Testament times.  But it vanished from history for centuries under Roman, Persian and Ottoman rule.  So how did the current Israeli nation finally come about?  And why, following it birth pains, has it barely had a day of peace since?

The roots go back to World War I.  Between 1517 and 1917, Palestine was part of the Turkish Ottoman Empire, which stretched from Africa, through the Middle East, to Turkey. Jews gradually migrated into Europe and eventually around the world.  During the Empire’s decline, Palestine was a sparsely populated, barren region with Jerusalem the only major city. The “Zionist” movement began to emerge in early twentieth century Europe. It was caused by growing European nationalism, rampant antisemitism and even violence against Jews. The Zionists desire was to return the Jewish people to a sovereign state in Palestine.  This fostered Jews immigrating back to Israel.

In 1917, at the height of World War I, British Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour submitted The Balfour Declaration, to the British Jewish community.  It supported the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine. At the end of World War I, the 400-year-old Ottoman Empire was defeated. Its vast lands in the Middle East were split up and given to the victorious Allies (Britain and France).  They carved the empire up into new nations for the Arabs: Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, and Egypt, drawing straight lines on a map. 

These new arbitrary borders would cause havoc for decades.

Under the World War I 1920 Treaty of Sèvres, the League of Nations gave Palestine to the British government. Britain’s Mandate was to implement the Balfour Declaration, to establish a national homeland in Palestine for the Jews. Even before the declaration, European Jews had begun to purchase land and resettle in Palestine. Arabs vehemently opposed the Balfour Declaration, fearing that a Jewish homeland would subjugate the Arab Palestinians.

In July 1922, the British divided Palestine into two administrative districts with Jews in the west side of the Jordan River and Arabs in the east side.  The Jewish population grew over the next 20 years to around 600,000 by World War II. Of course, Palestinian Arabs had already been living there for generations. While Jewish immigration continued, the nationalism of Palestinian Arabs also emerged. They aspired to their own Independence in the same land. Violent clashes were inevitable. As just one example, both Jews and Muslims consider the city of Jerusalem sacred to their religions.

The British authorities were constantly challenged by Zionist demands for Jewish self-government, and the Arab nationalists rejecting the Jewish presence. Jewish-Arab violence began, including attacks on British personnel. The 1939 British “White Paper” stated that Palestine would be neither a Jewish or Arab state. It would rather be a combined independent state. It also limited Jewish immigration to just 75,000 for the next five years. Restrictions were also placed on how much land Jews could buy. It remained in effect for the next 10 years.

As World War II brewed, many Jews living in Europe feared persecution under Hitler’s Nazi regime. They left and sought refuge in Palestine, and even embraced Zionism. Those that did not leave in time, tragically faced Nazi Concentration Camps and the gas chambers. After the Jewish Holocaust and World War II ended, members of the Zionist movement focused on creating an independent Jewish state once and for all.

In 1946, Britain partitioned the region and created an independent Palestine-Arab state in the eastern half – Jordan. Then in 1947, Britain announced its intention to terminate its governance of Palestine.  The UN General Assembly stepped in and appointed a special committee to come up with a solution. The committee recommended two states, Jewish and Arab, to be joined economically, with Jerusalem under international rule. In November 1947, the UN General Assembly instead voted on a partition plan, adopted by a two-thirds majority of nations.

The Jewish side accepted the UN plan. The Arab states rejected it.

The day the British Mandate over Palestine ended, Israel as an independent state was officially declared in Tel Aviv on May 14, 1948.  The new nation received its old Biblical name of Israel rather than the old Roman name of Palestine. The leader of the World Zionist Organization, David Ben-Gurion, became the first Prime Minister. He read the ‘Declaration of Independence of the State of Israel’ at the Tel Aviv Museum. 

“The state of Israel will be open to Jewish immigration and to the coming home of our exiles. Israel will be founded on the teaching of freedom, justice and peace; it will promote the full social and political equality of all its citizens, without any distinction in faith, race or sex; it will guarantee the full freedom of conscience, religion, education and upbringing; it will hold dear the holiness and inviolability of the holy places of all religions; and it will be loyal to these principles.”
David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first Prime Minister
David Ben-Gurion, Israel’s first Prime Minister

The neighboring Arab countries all refused to accept that Israel was an independent state. Only a few hours after the Declaration, five Arab countries from the new Arab League, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, Egypt, and Iraq, attacked Israel in an attempt to eliminate the new Jewish state. In addition, Palestinians within Israel rose up against the Jews.

A War for Israeli Independence had begun.

The newly formed Israeli Defense Force (IDF) managed to prevail after fifteen months of war. In 1949, the conflict came to an end. During the Arab-Israeli War, about 650,000 Palestinian Arabs fled the land. Israel signed a suspension of arms with Egypt (not a peace treaty). A cease-fire also followed with Lebanon, as well as with Jordan. Syria was the last country to lay down its arms. They continued to refuse to acknowledge the Jewish State. The UN, US and USSR on the contrary, did.  The new Israeli parliament, the Knesset, met for the first time in 1949.

Violent clashes between Israelis and Arabs, often escalating to war, have continued ever since. Much of the conflict has centered around who is occupying the Gaza Strip, between Israel and Egypt, the Golan Heights, between Israel and Syria, and the West Bank, between Israel and Jordan. A half dozen more full scale wars have ensued since then, including the Six Day War (1967), the Yom Kippur War (1973), the Lebanon War (1982), and the Gaza War (2006).

Key territories are claimed by both group Jews and Palestinians, and both cite Jerusalem as their capital.  While Israel doesn’t recognize Palestine as a state, more than 135 UN member nations do. Meanwhile, Israel has encouraged the growth of Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank.  The Palestinians remain divided between the semi-autonomous Gaza Strip and West Bank regions.  Arab militant groups have emerged over time, including the Palestine Liberation Organization, ISIS, Hezbollah, and Hamas.  

Since 1948, Israel’s population has grown tenfold. Today there are about 8.5 million Israelis; 75% of them Jews. Several countries including the U.S. and U.N. have attempted to negotiate peace agreements over the decades since 1949, with limited success. Many have suggested a two-state solution, but acknowledge that Israelis and Palestinians are unlikely to agree on one any time soon.  Most Arab and Muslim states continue to deny Israel’s right to exist.

Peace in the Middle East?

Two Middle Eastern states have signed peace agreements with Israel—Egypt (in 1979) negotiated by U.S. President Jimmy Carter, and Jordan (in 1994) negotiated by Bill Clinton. They demonstrate that peace is possible … with dogged persistence, and strict nonviolence.

For more by historical writer Paul Andrews, click BOOKS
LOST IN HISTORY menu
Home » Blog » Page 10

Podcast: Benito Mussolini and the Rise of Fascism

We hear a great deal from politicians these days about the growing dangers of Fascism, or even just Socialism.  Political leaders throw the terms about as if the two were the same. Democratic Socialism is practiced successfully today by nearly every European Union country.  But what about Fascism?  It got its start a decade BEFORE Adolf Hitler and the Nazis, under Italian dictator Benito Mussolini.

Italian Dictator Benito Mussolini, Il Duce
Italian Dictator Benito Mussolini, “Il Duce“
For more by historical writer Paul Andrews, click BOOKS

LOST IN HISTORY Podcasts

The 1791 Haitian Revolution by Black Slaves

Haitian Revolution
Haitian Black Slaves revolt against French control in 1791

The Haitian Revolution was the largest, most successful slave rebellion in the Western World. Black slaves initiated a rebellion in 1791 and by 1803, they’d ended not just slavery, but achieved independence over French colonial rule. Ironically, it was influenced by the French Revolution of 1789. This had brought forth new concepts of human rights, citizenship, and representation. In 1791, an organized slave rebellion broke out, marking the start of a 12-year revolution for freedom, lead by a former slave, Toussaint l’Overture. The Haitian Revolution is the only successful slave revolt in history. It established Haiti as the first, independent black state in the New World.  How did an island of enslaved people accomplish such a remarkable feat?

In the 1700’s, Haiti was still Saint-Domingue, France’s wealthiest colony.  It generated more revenue for France than ALL the British American colonies did for England.  Saint-Domingue furnished two-thirds of France’s overseas trade, employing 1,000 ships. The colony was France’s richest, the envy of every other European nation.  All this wealth came from the island’s sugar, coffee, and cotton plantations, all grown by slaves. France transported 773,000 African slave to Saint-Domingue. French slave owners worked African slaves as brutally as in the Americas. So Saint-Domingue was fertile ground for an angry slave rebellion.

Haitian slaves were inspired by both the American and French Revolutions.

Several hundred freed slaves had joined French soldiers in the American Revolutionary War.  They returned to Saint-Domingue disillusioned by their treatment from white French officers. The French Revolution was also crucially important. The Declaration of the Rights of Man, was passed by the National Assembly in France in 1789. It stated, “In the eyes of the law, all citizens are equal.” When news of the Declaration reached the colonies, it brought new hope to the black slaves. Meanwhile, plantation owners ignored it, and continued to exploit the slaves for profit.  They did so at their own risk.

There were four ‘players’ in the Haitian Revolution. 1) The white French planters— the grand blancs, who owned the plantations and the slaves.  2) The petit blancs, who were the shop keepers, craftspeople and teachers. The whites numbered just 40,000 and they began to support independence from France.  Like the Americans, they did not have representation in France. Despite their calls for independence, they remained committed to slavery.  3) The freed slaves, numbering around 30,000, were half mulattos (mixed black-white race).  4) Finally, there were the half a million African slaves, outnumbering the whites 10 to 1.

The new General Assembly in Paris had enacted legislation which gave their colonies some autonomy. The legislation was radical compared to life under King Louis XVI. Saint-Domingue’s wealthy planter class felt the autonomy applied only to them. The legislation, meant to appease Saint-Domingue, instead generated a three-sided dispute between the planters, the petit blancs, and the free blacks.  All three would be challenged, however, by the black slave majority, which was also inspired by events in Paris. 

All the Haitians needed was their own George Washington.

Toussaint l'Ouverture, Father of Haiti
Toussaint l’Ouverture, Father of Haiti

They found him in a former slave Toussaint l’Ouverture.  Toussaint was born a slave, baptized Catholic and grew up on a plantation, working in the stables as a coachman.  When the owner died, his son granted l’Ouverture his freedom.  As a free black, he now worked as an employee, learned to read and write, and eventually bought a small farm and prospered.  By 1791, he was in his forties and also inspired by the ideals of the French Revolution. l’Ouverture secretly joined other black rebel leaders in the north.  He became secretary and lieutenant to the rebellion’s leader, Georges Biassou.

Under their leadership, the slaves acted first, rising up by the thousands and rebelling against the white planters in August 1791. The northern settlements were hit first on the Plaine du Nord.  The flood of rebel slaves that overwhelmed them revealed both their organization and their military strength. Plantation houses were burnt to the ground and white owners murdered and mutilated. Over 900 plantations were overrun by their numbers, increasing with each raid towards 100,000 motivated slaves.

By 1792, they controlled a third of the island, but the conflict would last another 11 years. L’Ouverture now led a line of posts between rebel and colonial territory. Despite reinforcements from France, the rebel territory grew, as did the bloodshed. But the creole unity against slavery bound the blacks together and sustained the rebellion. After the rebels initial success, the port of Le Cap (Cap-Haitien) fell into the hands of French republican forces. l’Ouverture and thousands of blacks responded by preventing their advance inland.  Battles would continue for another year, with the rebels slowly beating back the French forces. 

On 29 August 1793, Toussaint l’Overture found his voice. 

l’Ouverture was a charismatic leader who both motivated and inspired. He made his famous declaration at Camp Turel in the mountains, to all the black population of Saint-Domingue: “Brothers and friends, I am Toussaint Louverture. I have undertaken Vengeance. I want Liberty and Equality to reign in St. Domingue. I am working to make that happen. Unite yourselves to us, Brothers and fight with us for the same cause.”  On the same day, the beleaguered French governor, Léger-Félicité Sonthonax, emancipated all Haitian slaves and abolished slavery in Saint-Domingue!

The former slaves managed to stave off not only the French forces, but also the British and Spanish.  The British arrived in the fall of 1793, hoping to conquer a French colony in turmoil and claim the rich island for themselves.  They particularly wanted to reinstate slavery to set an example to their own slave colonies in the Caribbean.  Spain controlled the eastern portion of Hispaniola island and was at war with France.  The British and Spanish supplied the rebels with food, ammunition, arms, medicine, and even military advisors.  l’Ouverture was happy to accept their assistance.

In June of 1794, a larger British force landed with allied Spanish ships to attack the French. But the British forces soon fell victim to yellow fever, the dreaded ‘black vomit’ with 5,000 soldiers perishing. Realizing the Spanish intended to reinstate slavery, Toussaint turned on his allies and pledged his support to the French republicans. Together they drove the Spanish forces out of Saint-Domingue. 

The French government rewarded l’Ouverture by appointing him governor in 1796.  

In June 1796, the British attempted another “Great Push” to take Saint-Domingue once and for all. They took control of Port-au-Prince, but once again, the black vomit decimated their ranks.  l’Ouverture’s forces repelled any attempt to invade the northern or southern provinces, shocking the disciplined British military with his slave army.  Britain withdrew for good in 1798.   With the British gone, l’Ouverture had to briefly deal with a civil war of his freed slaves against the Haitian mulattos, until he could regain total control and reunite the people.

Haitian slave army fights British invaders in 1796
Haitian slave army fights British invaders in 1796

By 1801, l’Ouverture took his revolution beyond Haiti, conquering the neighboring Spanish colony of Santo Domingo (present-day Dominican Republic).  He freed the slaves and abolished slavery there as well, then declared himself Governor-General over the entire island of Hispaniola. Toussaint now was the head of a semi-independent San Domingo.  [Haitian control of Santo Domingo would last until 1844.]

The new Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte saw Saint-Domingue as a threat. 

He sent his brother-in-law, General Victor-Emmanuel Leclerc with 43,000 French troops to restore French rule, capture Toussaint, AND re-establish slavery. The French forces arrived in February 1802.  By that year, the Haitian Revolution had outlasted the French Revolution. l’Ouverture met with his general, Jean-Jacques Dessalines, to plan their defense.  All the French assaults failed and the rainy season brought back yellow fever, decimating the French ranks much like the British.

Then the wind was suddenly knocked out of the proud Haitians’ sails.  Under the pretense of negotiations, Leclerc tricked L’Ouverture into meeting.  He was instead arrested as a revolutionary. Without trial, Leclerc shipped him away to a prison across the Atlantic Ocean in France.  Leclerc caught yellow fever, like most of his men, and died later that year.

The struggle for independence managed to continue. By late 1803, Jean-Jacques Dessalines united the north and south provinces and attacked the French army. Now led by Leclerc’s replacement, the Vicomte de Rochambeau, the French were finally defeated at the Battle of Vertieres. On January 1804, Dessalines declared the nation independent and renamed it Hayti, after the indigenous name for the island. France grudgingly recognized its independence.

Hayti became the first black republic in the world, and the second nation in the west (after the U.S.) to win its independence from a colonial master. But not without a great cost. Before the fighting was all ended, 100,000 of the 500,000 black population and 24,000 of the 40,000 whites were dead.

Dessalines, L’Ouverture’s general and a former slave himself, proclaimed himself Emperor of Hayti to mock Napoleon.  He was assassinated two years later in 1806 and a civil war ensued on the island.  Nevertheless, the rebel slaves had shattered the enslaved French colony and forged the free nation of Hayti. What became of Toussaint l’Ouverture? After writing his memoir in jail, he died in the French prison from pneumonia in April 1803, 7 months before the Battle of Vertieres. He was only 59. 

l’Overture is known today as the ‘Father of Hayti.’

During both the rebellion and revolution from 1791 to 1803, wealthy white planters fled to the French colony of Louisiana in North America. They took their slaves with them and spread horror stories of the Haitian Revolution. Their vivid tales emboldened American plantation slaveowners that they could not make any concessions to enslaved people.  Given the chance, they feared their slaves would revolt against them as well.  It was one of the reasons America slavery would last until 1863.

Haiti has since suffered through a series of autocratic rulers, corruption, gang riots, earthquakes, poverty and even a 19-year U.S. occupation from 1915-1934.  None of that however can take away from the hard-fought Haitian Revolution, and Haiti’s historical place in the world as the first, black independent republic.

For more by historical writer Paul Andrews, click BOOKS.

LOST IN HISTORY blog menu

The Secret World War II Bretton Woods Conference

Mount Washington Hotel, Breton Woods, New Hampshire
Mount Washington Hotel, Bretton Woods, New Hampshire

Not all the major battles in World War II were in Europe or the Pacific.  Some involved intense negotiations between the Allied nations – negotiations on what the post-war world would look like economically. The most significant was the secret Bretton Woods Conference of 1944.  It was a gathering of delegates from 44 nations from around the world.  They met in July in remote Bretton Woods, New Hampshire in the U.S.  Just a month earlier D-Day, the Allied Invasion of Normandy had taken place.  The Nazis were finally starting to retreat from France after 4 years of brutal occupation. In the Pacific, the Allies were slowly island-hopping towards Imperial Japan.

It was time to make plans for what the world would look like once Hitler and Hirohito were defeated. At Bretton Woods, representatives would agree upon desperately-needed international financial rules for the post-war era. Their two chief accomplishments would change the world’s finances for decades.  They created both the International Monetary Fund and The World Bank.  No small feat for 44 nations at one secret, 3-week long conference. Think about such a global compromise ever being reached today. So how did it come about?

There were some serious lessons learned by world leaders from the years between World War I and WWII, in particular, the Great Depression. President Franklin D. Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill believed that free trade would promote both international prosperity AND peace. The policies adopted by governments to combat the Great Depression of the 1930’s – high tariffs, competitive currencies, restrictive trading policies – created an unstable international atmosphere that only worsened the situation.

Many leaders felt the Great Depression led to tensions that created the second World War. 

This bad experience led the leaders of the 1940’s to realize that economic cooperation, not competition, was the way to achieve both prosperity AND peace. The US and UK saw the opportunity for a new international system that would draw on those lessons and provide for postwar reconstruction. They wanted a new system that would avoid the rigid global economy, but also address the lack of cooperation between countries. It would be an unprecedented cooperative effort.

The Atlantic Charter, issued by Roosevelt and Churchill at the Atlantic Conference in 1941, was the spark for the Bretton Conference.  They expressed a commitment to economic collaboration between ALL nations. Washington and London agreed to begin talks aimed at achieving these international economic goals.  From 1942 to 1944, international financial experts held dozens of multilateral meetings in order to agree upon a common approach.

Three long years of planning and meetings preceded Bretton Woods and laid the foundation for the conference’s success.  The initial proposals were greatly influenced by the early plans of the US and UK.  But other countries also presented proposals containing their own vision for an international economy. A preliminary meeting was held in Atlantic City, New Jersey in June 1944.

The conference was formally known as the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference.  

It convened on July 1, 1944.  730 Delegates descended upon the secluded Mount Washington Hotel in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire, including dozens of translators. The massive Mount Washington Hotel was a luxury retreat for the wealthy from the city heat of summer. As the meeting was secret, the entire hotel was booked.  The owners were paid $300,000 for the loss of business and promised a daily room rate of $18 per person. 

The 44 nations attending: Australia, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Ethiopia, France, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras,  Iceland, India (British colony), Iran, Iraq, Liberia, Luxembourg, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand,  Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, South Africa, Soviet Union, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Venezuela, and Yugoslavia.

The Bretton Woods delegates envisioned an international monetary system that would ensure stable exchange rates, prevent competitive devaluations, and promote economic growth. Although everyone agreed on those lofty goals, plans to implement them differed greatly. To reach a joint agreement would have been an impossible task were it not for those 3 years of painstaking preparation.

Their purpose was simple but daunting – to agree on a system of economic order and international cooperation.  One that would both help European and Pacific countries recover from the war’s devastation AND foster long-term global financial growth. The success or failure of Bretton Woods was largely dependent on the British-American negotiators.

US Harry White (left) and UK John Keynes (right) at Bretton Woods
US Harry White (left) and UK John Keynes (right) at Bretton Woods, 1944

The British representative was the prominent economist and advisor to the British Treasury John Maynard Keynes. The U.S. representative was Harry Dexter White, the chief international economist at the Treasury Department.  They would become the primary designers of the new system. Given U.S. military dominance during the war, White was able to exercise a powerful influence.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau served as conference president. The conference was divided into 3 commissions. Harry White chaired Commission I to deal with the monetary fund. John Keynes chaired Commission II to deal with the world bank. Commission III dealt with international financial cooperation and was chaired by Eduardo Suárez, Mexico’s Minister of Finance.  Each commission had a number of committees and subcommittees.

Keynes predicted that the U.S. would fall into another Great Depression after the war.

He was acutely concerned about the global postwar economy. Keynes called for the creation of a large institution with the resources and authority to step in when global imbalances occur. He proposed a global central bank called the Clearing Union. This bank would issue a new international currency, the “bancor,” which would be used to settle international imbalances.

White’s plan was one of more limited powers and resources. He proposed a new monetary institution called the Stabilization Fund. Rather than issue a new currency, it would be funded with a finite pool of currencies and gold that would effectively limit the supply of reserve credit. Keynes wanted unlimited access to the fund. White wanted the rights to draw on the fund to be linked to contributions.           

The Bretton Woods Conference attempted to resolve these dueling conflicts. The disadvantages of either floating or fixed exchange rates were avoided by ‘pegging‘ each currency against gold. Dollars were fixed in value against gold and were the only currency directly convertible into gold. (So not long after WWII, the dollar became the dominant world currency.)

The Bretton Conference delegation of 44 nations, 1944
The Bretton Conference delegation of 44 nations, July 1944

After three weeks of intense discussion, negotiation and compromise, the conference ended on July 22, 1944.  The delegates signed the Final Act of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference.  The final plan mostly resembled the White plan, with concessions made to the Keynes plan.  The 730 delegates agreed to establish two new institutions. It included a charter outlining both the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Articles of Agreement for the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (World Bank).

The IMF would monitor a system of exchange rates centered on the U.S. dollar and gold, lend reserve currencies to nations with deficits and contribute to the expansion of world trade. The IBRD was to be responsible for providing financial assistance for the reconstruction of war-ravaged nations and the economic development of less developed countries.

A year later, in July 1945, the U.S. Congress passed the Bretton Woods Agreements Act, authorizing U.S. entry into the IMF and IBRD. World War II ended that same summer. The IMF and IBRD Articles of Agreement were ratified six months later in December 1945, when representatives from 21 countries met in Washington, D.C. to become the IMF’s and World Bank’s first members.

In 1958, the Bretton Woods System became fully functional as global currencies became convertible. Countries settled international balances in dollars, and U.S. dollars were convertible to gold. The United States had the responsibility of keeping the price of gold fixed and had to adjust the supply of dollars to maintain confidence in gold.

Today, the IMF and World Bank have 190 member nations.

The Soviet Union had signed the Bretton Woods Final Act. But after WWII, as the Cold War began to bubble, Premier Josef Stalin decided not to ratify it, stating that the International Monetary Fund and World Bank were simply “branches of American Wall Street.“ The USSR never joined the IMF and IBRD, though interestingly its successor, the Russian Federation, did in 1992.

Regardless, the foundations of our current globally-dependent economy were laid by 44 nations at a secret conference in New Hampshire near the close of World War II.

For more by historical author Paul Andrews, click BOOKS.
LOST IN HISTORY
Home » Blog » Page 10

The Exotic and Unreachable Timbuktu

Depiction of Timbuktu during the Golden Age
Depiction of Timbuktu during the Golden Age

The name “Timbuktu” in popular culture usually refers to some remote, far-away place.  “Crikey, you live way out in Timbuktu!”  For others, it may conjure up exotic images of a desert oasis full of camels, palm trees, and turbans.  Timbuktu is actually a city in west Africa, located in the center of the nation of Mali.  It lies within the southern edge of the vast Sahara Desert about 20 km north of the Niger River. It even looks like a desert outpost, with most mosques and structures built of sand-brown adobe.

For centuries, Timbuktu, was a bustling center of trade, wealth, culture and learning during the “Golden Age of Islam.”  It was larger than London in the 14th century.  Today, it is a sad shadow of its former self.  With few modern buildings, a non-existent tourist trade, and no major industry, it is slowly crumbling away, becoming a part of the Saharan sands itself.    

What caused such a drastic turn of events?  

Due to its strategic location at the southern edge of the Saharan Desert, and the northern edge of the Niger River delta, Timbuktu used to be a key desert trading city.  When Islam came to the local Tuareg people, the desert tribes expanded the religion via trading posts like Timbuktu.  The Tuaregs built the first mosque, the Sankoré Mosque, in 1100 AD.  All the West African and Saharan kingdoms traded heavily there. It also became a key link between Arab Muslims and West African Muslims.

The Mali Empire came to power in the 13th century on the Niger River, then grew in prestige and influence.  The empire became a hub of trade, learning, culture, and mosques. Malian King Mansu Mousa annexed the city of Timbuktu in 1324.  Almost overnight, Timbuktu transformed from a trading post into a center of commerce and scholarship.  Caravans exchanged salt, gold, ivory and slaves.  Powerful West African and Islamic tribes traveled from across Africa to trade, learn, and foster alliances. 

While Europe struggled through the Dark Ages and the Black Plague, the Mali Empire thrived. Mansa Mousa invited Islamic scholars to Timbuktu and together built the Djinguereber Mosque. In the 15th century, when Tuareg king Akil Akamalwa came to power, he then built the great Sidi Yahya mosque, all rivalling those in Cairo. 

By the 15th century, Timbuktu was in its own “Golden Age” as one of the world’s great centers of learning, much like the former Alexandria in Egypt. In Timbuktu, vast collections of books symbolized wealth, power, and blessings from Allah. Hundreds of scholars studied at the nearly 200 maktabs (Quranic schools).  The 3 great mosques were centers of learning, not just Islamic law but also geography, mathematics, and astronomy.   

“Salt comes from the north, gold from the south, but the word of God and the treasures of wisdom are only to be found in Timbuctoo.”

Malian proverb

The Mali Empire was replaced in the 15th century by the Songhai Empire. Askia Muhammad, reigned from 1492 to 1528 and continued the Islamic learning tradition in Timbuktu.   All that glory and prestige changed when Morocco’s Saadian dynasty invaded the empire. They seized control of Timbuktu in 1591. Much of the city’s centers of learning were destroyed in the raid and many important manuscripts were lost. Under Moroccan control, the city began its long, slow decline.

Meanwhile, in Europe, Timbuktu did not escape notice. 

It had built up a reputation as a kind of African El Dorado, a city of gold, hidden somewhere deep in the sun-baked Sahara.  European explorers began making the dangerous trek into Africa, searching for this legendary city. Those who came inland from the western coast often died of malaria and other tropical diseases on the muddy Niger River.  Those who dared to cross the scorching sands of the Sahara faced death by dehydration, starvation, and marauding Tuareg warriors.

English poet Alfred Lord Tennyson even composed a lyric poem Timbuctoo, which only fueled the romantic image of the city. He wrote: “Wide Africa … is the rumour of thy Timbuctoo, a dream as frail as that of ancient Time?”

Scottish explorer Gordon Laing was the first European to make it to Timbuktu in 1826.  But he did not live to tell the tale back in Edinburgh.  Desert marauders attacked his caravan and murdered him.  Frenchman René -Auguste Caillié was the first explorer to reach Timbuktu two years later in 1828 and survive the trek. After crossing the Sahara, he brought tales of his adventure back to Europe, but by then Timbuktu was already in its decline.

“I have been to Timbuktu!” he excitedly told the French consul in Tangier.  But after all the tales of gilded minarets and palaces bursting with gold, Caillie was deeply disappointed.

“The city presented, at first view, nothing but a mass of buildings built of earth. It is considerably less grand than its reputation.  One doesn’t see a great rush of foreigners coming and going. In a word, everything exuded the greatest sadness.”

Rene-Auguste Caillie

Timbuktu took a further step downward when French colonial troops invaded West Africa later that century.  Timbuktu became a formal part of the colony of French Sudan in 1891.  Much of Timbuktu’s culture was sadly looted and taken back to France.  Some European tourists did come to Mali, to get a sepia photo of themselves riding camels at Timbuktu’s gates or visiting the famous mosques. 

The French colonial government did little to halt the city’s decline.

Meanwhile Timbuktu’s Tuaregs, the blue-robed desert marauders, inspired Hollywood films like Beau Geste about the French Foreign Legion.  After World War II, the French government, under Charles de Gaulle, granted the colony autonomy, then its freedom, creating the democratic Republic of Mali in 1960.

And what about contemporary times in Timbuktu? Regrettably, climate change has caused severe droughts for Mali in the 1980s and 1990s, nearly depleting Timbuktu’s water supplies. The Saharan sands began encroaching upon the ancient city, nature slowly reclaiming its property. 

In 2012, Tuareg rebels led a coup and took over Northern Mali, including Timbuktu. 

Compared to their ancestors, these modern raiders swapped camels for 4 x 4s, and swords for AK-47s. They threatened the cultural heritage of Mali by burning thousands of ancient manuscripts. They destroyed anything perceived as forbidden to their extreme brand of Islam, including its century-old manuscripts.  Prior to the Tuareg coup, the country was viewed as one of West Africa’s most stable democracies.

Timbuktu's Djinguereber Mosque
Timbuktu’s Djinguereber Mosque

A small team of Islamic scholars was able to rescue over 350,000 brittle manuscripts from 45 different libraries in and around Timbuktu and get them to the Mali capital.  Some were hidden for generations in desert caves by Malians to keep them from Moroccan invaders, and then French colonialists, and now Tuareg rebels. They managed to save a written history as old as the European Renaissance, an anthology from science and medicine, to history and politics.

With the Islamic rebels, some preaching strict Sharia, now in control of Timbuktu, tourists may not be returning any time soon. Most Western embassies have advisories against any travel to Timbuktu.  Most hotels are empty or closed. France sent in troops to help the Mali government, but withdrew them after a recent military-led coup in 2021.

Today, Timbuktu sadly struggles with poverty and the consequences of the Tuareg rebellion. At this point, it is uncertain whether climate and/or military unrest will lead to Timbuktu’s ultimate doom. All that would be left behind is its mythical image as the famed crossroads of the Sahara. In an ironic way, it has again become a legendary, remote, unreachable city.

For more by historical writer Paul Andrews, click BOOKS 

LOST IN HISTORY blog menu

Mother Teresa of Calcutta was a Living Saint to the Poor

Mother Teresa and the poor children of Calcutta
Mother Teresa and the poor children of Calcutta

Most people remember Mother Teresa as a tiny, frail, Catholic nun in a white habit; her weathered face lined with deep creases.  She was always seen tending to the poor, sick and dying in India, or other Third World countries, usually with an impossibly warm smile on her face.  But there was so much more to this determined, faith-driven woman than just that singular image. 

Did you know she started the Missionaries of Charity order in Calcutta/Kolkata in 1948?  By the time she died in 1997, there were nearly 4,000 sisters in 610 missions in 123 countries around the world – not to mention the orphanages, schools and hospitals she started. This is quite the accomplishment for a soft-spoken, 5 foot tall nun. So who exactly was she?

Mother Teresa was born Gonxha (Agnes) Bojaxhiu in 1910 in Skopje (Uskub), Albania, in what was then the Ottoman Empire. She was the youngest of three surviving children born to Nikola and Drane Bojaxhiu.  For a time, the family lived comfortably, her father owning a thriving construction business. But life changed drastically when her father died suddenly when Agnes was just eight. 

From a young age, Agnes was intrigued with the stories of foreign missionaries who served abroad.  By the time she was 12, she told her mother she’d decided to commit herself to a life of religion. At the age of 18, she joined the Sisters of Loreto at Loreto Abbey in Dublin Ireland, with the intention of becoming a foreign missionary.

In 1928, Agnes said goodbye to her family and started an amazing missionary journey that would last the rest of her life.  Later that year, she left for India as a novitiate for her first assignment, arriving in Calcutta in 1929. Her order assigned her to the Loreto Entally community. Two years later, Agnes made her first vows and took the name Sister Teresa after St. Thérèse of Lisieux, the patron saint of missionaries.  She taught history and geography at St. Mary’s secondary school for girls.  She learned Bengali and other Hindi dialects in order to communicate with her students. In 1937, Sister Teresa made her Final Vows and was thereafter called Mother Teresa.

She continued teaching at St. Mary’s and in 1944, after 15 years in India, became the school’s headmistress. She loved all her students and her time in Loreto was happy. But she could not ignore or escape the realities all around her—the Calcutta slums, poverty, suffering, sick, hungry and destitute.

Then in 1946, something transformational happened to her.

She was on a train to Darjeeling for a retreat in the Himalayan foothills.  In her compartment, Mother Teresa received her inspiration, what she referred to as “a call within a call.”  For her, the message from God was clear.  He was sorrowful at the neglect of the poor. “Come be My light.” She was to leave the school and convent, leave her students and sisters.  Instead, Mother Teresa was to help the poor, while living amongst them.  She would serve Christ by following Him into the slums.  She would succeed by radiating His love.  She was just 36, and it would become the driving force for the rest of her life.

A Young Agnes (future Mother Teresa)
A Young Agnes (future Mother Teresa)

Mother Teresa returned and asked the archbishop to establish a new religious community of charitable missionaries, dedicated to serving the poorest of the poor.  To prepare herself, Mother Teresa took a nursing course while she waited for an answer.

After nearly two years of discernment by the Vatican, Mother Teresa finally received permission to begin her mission. She gave away all of her personal possessions in order to live like the poor she would serve. In 1948, she dressed for the first time, not in a nun’s black habit, but rather a white, blue-bordered cotton sari and sandals. She left the gates of her beloved Loreto convent to enter the slums.

Mother Teresa found temporary lodging in Calcutta with The Little Sisters of the Poor. She started each day with rosary in hand and went out into the slums, to find Jesus in “the unwanted, the unloved, and the uncared for.” She visited poor families, washed the sores of children, cared for old men lying sick on the street and nursed those dying of disease.

Dressed like an ordinary, poor Indian woman, she began to get to know her neighbors—the poor and sick—and getting to know their needs. Driven by compassion and a strong sense of duty, Mother Teresa began to teach those she encountered how to care for themselves and others with illness. In 1950, the Archdiocese of Calcutta officially established the new Missionaries of Charity.

The work was exhausting, but she was not alone for long.

After some months, volunteers came to join her, some of them former students, some fellow sisters.  They became the core of the Missionaries of Charity.  She convinced the well-off to donate food, clothing, supplies, and the use of buildings. Mother Teresa’s work was not easy. The streets were deplorable and the poor had no way out of their situations.  So the sisters taught them skills like tailoring, soap-making, basket-weaving, and candle-making, so they could earn money themselves.

As the order expanded, they offered services to orphans, abandoned children, addicts, and the aged. In 1952, the city gave Mother Teresa a former hostel, which she converted to a home for the dying and the destitute. The hospice cared for people suffering from cholera, leprosy and tuberculosis who were too poor to afford medical treatment. She cared for many with her own hands. After only a few years, they opened an orphanage and a number of schools throughout Calcutta, all run by sisters and volunteers working under her guidance.

“Christ is in the poor we meet, Christ is in the smile we give, and in the smile that we receive back.”

Mother Teresa of Calcutta

Some nationalist politicians began to complain that Mother Teresa’s work had an ulterior motive – to convert the Indian people to Christianity in order serve the Roman Catholic Church.  They said she was less interested in helping the poor than in using them to expand Catholic beliefs.  The government complained that her hospitals for the poor were dangerous as they lacked proper medical staffing, drugs and equipment.  An ironic statement considering that without her, the poor would have no medical intervention at all.

By the 1960s, Mother Teresa began to send her sisters outside of Calcutta to other parts of India.

Then in 1965, Pope Paul VI encouraged her to open a mission half way around the world in Venezuela. It was soon followed by a mission in Tanzania and, eventually, on every continent. Starting in 1980 and continuing for the next two decades, the Missionaries of Charity opened missions in most Communist countries, including the former Soviet Union and Cuba.  During the Cold War, she was criticized for this by some political leaders in the West. 

Mother Teresa tending to the poorest of the poor of Calcutta
Mother Teresa tending to the poorest of the poor of Calcutta

She was also disparaged that she did little to end poverty.  To this she replied, “Ending poverty is a task for governments to solve.  Today, we shall feed the hungry.” For the next four decades, Mother Teresa worked tirelessly on behalf of the poor. Her energy knew no bounds as she crisscrossed the globe, pleading for support and inviting others to “See the face of Jesus in the poorest of the poor.”

All this is not to say that Mother Teresa never has a crisis of confidence, like any other human being. Behind her ever present smile, all her work for the poor never seemed to end.  Writing to her contemporaries, she once said, “For me, the dryness and darkness is so great, that I look and do not see God – Listen and do not hear Him – my tongue moves in prayer, but does not speak.”

In order to respond better to the global needs of poverty, Mother Teresa founded the Missionaries of Charity Brothers in 1963 and in 1984, the Missionaries of Charity Fathers. She also formed the Sick and Suffering Co-Workers, for people of other faiths and nationalities who she shared in her spirit of humble works of love toward the poor.

During these years of growth, the world slowly began to recognize Mother Teresa and her work.

She received the Nobel Peace Prize in 1979 at the age of 69, honoring her work with the poor. Rather than have the traditional Nobel honor banquet, she asked that the money be donated to the poor of India. She accepted the Nobel “for the glory of God, and in the name of the poor,” and used the opportunity to speak out about protecting the unborn. Increasingly, the media began to following her like a celebrity.

She received numerous other awards for her charity work, including the Presidential Medal of Freedom from U.S. President Ronald Reagan.  Millions in donations began to pour in and some politicians questioned how much of that went to the poor vs. administration of the now global Missionaries of Charity.  Mother Teresa took the criticism in stride. She said her labor reflected the love of Jesus and bore witness to the dignity of every human person, no matter their circumstance.

“I alone cannot change the world, but I can cast a stone across the waters to create many ripples.”

Mother Teresa of Calcutta

During the last years of her life, despite increasing health problems, Mother Teresa continued to run her Missions and respond to the needs of the global poor. She had a heart attack in Rome in 1983, while she visiting Pope John Paul II. Following a second heart attack in 1989, she received a pacemaker.

By 1997, her health was failing, but her success undeniable. Her sisters numbered nearly 4,000 and had established 610 missions in 123 countries. She blessed her elected successor and then made one more trip abroad to meet with Pope John Paul II for the last time.  She returned to Calcutta and spent her final weeks receiving visitors.

Mother Teresa died of heart failure that year at the age of 87. She was given a state funeral by the Indian Government.  Among those present were hundreds of Missionaries of Charity, the order she founded in 1948. Her body was buried in the Mother House of the Missionaries of Charity in Kolkata. Her tomb quickly became a place of pilgrimage and prayer for people of all faiths.

The Roman Catholic Church recognizes that Mother Teresa performed two miracles during her lifetime when she cured one Indian woman and one Brazilian man of their cancerous tumors. Less than two years after her death, Pope John Paul II permitted her Cause of Canonization, the first step in becoming a Catholic saint. She was beatified by Pope John Paul II in 2003, and canonized by Pope Francis in 2016 as Saint Mother Teresa.

Mother Teresa of Calcutta
Mother Teresa of Calcutta

Mother Teresa left a legacy of unshakable faith, irrepressible energy and extraordinary charity. At the time of her death, she ran foreign missions including homes for people with HIV/AIDS, leprosy and tuberculosis; soup kitchens; family counseling programs; clinics, orphanages and schools.  She may be remembered not just for her ministry to the poor, but her ministry to people of the world. Those people who perhaps had experienced some absence of God in their lives, and in seeking an answer, were inspired by her smile and selflessness.

For more by historical writer Paul Andrews, click BOOKS.

LOST IN HISTORY menu

The Count Saint-Germain series – Book 2

Who is the Count of Saint Germain? Immortal alchemist or clever charlatan? His true name is a mystery. His place of birth is unknown. His time of death is unconfirmed. He is an enigma.

Count Saint Germain, sequel to The Man Who Would Not Die. The latest historical novel from Paul Andrews, creator of LOST IN HISTORY. Follow the adventures of the mysterious Count on his next mission to save Europe from itself.
THE MAN WHO WOULD NOT DIE book cover historical novel
COUNT SAINT GERMAIN book cover historical novel
Book 1 at Amazon
Book 2 at Amazon

Join the Count as he risks the intrigue of the French court at Versailles, helps a Russian Princess become Tzarina, and stokes the fires of a Revolution in Paris. Along the way he encounters Madame du Pompadour, Giacomo Casanova, Catherine the Great, and his first love, Luciana.

The Count of Saint Germain was a true historical figure, with adventures throughout the 18th Century and across the globe. He played a behind-the-scenes role in everything from the Scottish Rebellion to the French Revolution, all while never appearing to age. He is followed by many to this day as an Ascended Master.

Read the latest historical novels by Paul Andrews, creator of LOST IN HISTORY.
Lost in History HOME

History vs. Nostalgia – What Baby Boomers Forget about the Sixties

Many Baby Boomers (those born between 1946 & 1964, now age 59 to 77) wax nostalgic about the decade of the 1960’s.  They see it as a time when America and the western world was somehow greater. The Good Old Days – where life was simpler, safer, and filled old-fashioned family values.  So much different than today’s chaotic planet. They seem to forget that the 1960’s was a turning point for the world.  It was, in fact, filled with global wars, tragic assassinations, and political unrest.  All of these led to positive, albeit painful, cultural changes Cold Warfor the better.  So let’s take a quick look at 6 key events/movements of the Sixties that changed our world forever.

1. The Vietnam War

US Army helicopters support troops in the Vietnam War during the Sixties
US Army helicopters support troops in the Vietnam War during the Sixties

The Vietnam War raged for 20 years from 1955 to 1975, yet perhaps never so violently, and with such a rapid escalation, than during the late Sixties under U.S. President Lyndon Johnson.  The U.S. and its allies, including Australia and South Korea, sent in troops supporting democratic South Vietnam. They were at war against Communist North Vietnam, supported by Red China and the Soviet Union.  Over time, the war spread into neighboring Cambodia and Laos.  The U.S. sent 1.5 million troops to Vietnam and over 58,000 of them died, including over 1 million Vietnamese.  The deadly Tet Offensive by North Vietnam in 1969 resulted in 1,500 U.S. killed, 3,000 South Vietnamese and an unknown number from the North.

Unlike the Iraqi Gulf Wars of the 2000’s, the Vietnam War was extremely unpopular in the U.S. and abroad.  A mandatory military draft sent thousands of young men overseas to fight in the dense jungle.  At home, students demonstrated with anti-war protests on university campuses and in the streets. The largest were at the University of Wisconsin and Washington D.C. in 1967, and outside the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago.  Every day, news headlines reported the loosing battles being fought by the U.S. military.

The futility of the Vietnam War eventually led to the withdrawal of troops by U.S. President Richard Nixon in 1975, and the fall of the Saigon capital.  Similar to the 20-year War in Afghanistan of this century, the opposing Communist forces rapidly took control of the nation, making it ultimately a decades-long failed effort.

2. The Civil Rights Movement

Sixties Civil Rights March on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, AL
Sixties Civil Rights March on the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma, AL

The Civil Rights Movement may have been born in the 1950’s, but it experienced its peak of both negative unrest and positive change in the Sixties.  The Woolworths lunch counter sit-ins in North Carolina cities happened in 1960.  The Freedom Riders tragic bus bombing went down in Alabama in 1961.  The violent Bloody Sunday occurred at the Selma, Alabama Edmund Pettus Bridge in 1965, when peaceful black protesters were violently beaten by the state police.  Nationwide race riots broke out throughout the entire decade, occurring in Harlem, Watts, Detroit, Cleveland, and Philadelphia, to name just a few.   And it wasn’t just an American issue.  In Britain, race riots in Notting Hill, London flanked the decade.

What positives came of all this unrest?  For one, the non-violent March on Washington for Freedom. It culminating in Dr. Martin Luther King Jr’s famous I Have a Dream speech, which took place in 1963 at the Lincoln Memorial.  U.S. President Lyndon Johnson signed the landmark Civil Rights Act in 1964, the Voting Rights Act in 1965, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968, leading to the start of racial desegregation and the start of fundamental integration across America.  The new laws, though impactful, did not however wipe out racism and bigotry.  That pair of human vices, though significantly blunted, is unfortunately still with us in the 2020’s.

3. The Hippie Counterculture

Sixties Hippie Bus during the 1967 Summer of Love
Sixties Hippie Bus during the 1967 Summer of Love

The Hippie Movement began in the mid-Sixties, primarily amongst young white men, women and teenagers in the US, UK, Canada, Europe, and Australia.  The Hippies rejected higher education, corporations, wars, the military, and general middle class “squareness.”  They instead embraced sexual liberation, Eastern philosophy, nature, meditation, and psychedelic drugs.  The hippies created and lived in Free-Love communes in the countryside. ‘Peace’ became their mantra, ‘Make Love not War‘ their slogan, and ‘Groovy’ the new catch phrase.

During the famous Summer of Love in 1967, hippies gathered in San Francisco to celebrate the movement.  Their music was a mixture of folk, rock, and blues – propagated by the later Beatles, Rolling Stones, Jefferson Airplane and Grateful Dead.  It culminated in the famous 1969 Woodstock Music Festival on a remote farm in New York state, where a half-a-million hippies came to dance and hear Joan Baez, Janis Joplin, Jimmy Hendrix and The Who. And it wasn’t just America.  Isle of Wight Music Festival in 1970 topped Woodstock a year later by the with over 600,000 hippies and 50 musical acts.

The rest of society labeled them as flower children, dropouts, or druggies.  Hippies joined college students in anti-Vietnam War protests, many of which led to riots and violent clashes with city police.  By the 1970s, the Hippie Movement became a part of our culture as they got married, had kids, and began careers.  Its legacy today is seen in everything from recycling and renewable energy, to Punk and Goth, to organic health foods and recreational drug use.  Aging hippies are now your older neighbors who occasionally kick back, light up a joint in their yard, and reminisce about the Sixties.

4. The Feminist Movement

Women protesting for equal rights in the Sixties
Women protesting for equal rights in the Sixties

The Feminist Movement began in the early Sixties, primarily amongst middle-class white women.  Prior to that, men expected women to marry and be housewives, staying at home to raise the children born during the post-war baby boom.  Careers and higher education were for men, and any work outside the home would be limited to low paying jobs.  The movement began with the publication of The Feminine Mystique by Betty Frieden. It challenged the idea that a woman’s only place was in the home.  In 1966, Friedan joined other women to found the National Organization for Women and be named its first president.  They protested in the streets for equal pay, equal opportunity, and equal rights.

Cosmopolitan rebranded their women’s magazine in 1965 from homemaking to feminism. Editor in chief, Helen Gurley Brown, focused on modern, working, independent woman.  The Feminist Movement went on to shine a light on sexual harassment in the workplace and domestic violence at home; as well as the need for access to contraception and childcare. Journalist and activist Gloria Steinem joined the movement, writing for New York magazine and later forming Ms magazine.  One group of women even threatened (though they never did) to burn their bras at the 1968 Miss America Pageant in Atlantic City as a sign of protest. 

The legacy of the Sixties’ Feminist Movement should be clear to any woman of today who has or had a college degree, career, children, and/or home. There is still much room for growth, however, when it comes to things like equal pay and opportunities compared to men.

5. The Superpowers’ Cold War

Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev and US President John Kennedy in the Sixties
Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev and US President John Kennedy in the Sixties

While the world certainly has its issues today with the Russian Federation, led by President Vladimir Putin, it cannot compare with the Superpowers’ Cold War of the Sixties. Both sides built nuclear arsenals that would not only obliterate the enemy, but destroy the entire world ten times over.  Families built nuclear bomb shelters in their back yards rather than swimming pools.  Children practiced air-raid drills in schools by climbing under their desks. Eas Germany constructed the infamous Berlin Wall in 1961 and would stand for 28 long years.  Then there was the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, when the US and USSR sat on the brink of World War III and global nuclear annihilation. 

Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev and President John Kennedy were prepared to go to full-scale nuclear war over the presence of Soviet nuclear missiles based in Cuba, and a subsequent U.S. naval blockade of the Caribbean island.  For 13 tense days, each leader had their “finger on the button,” so-to-speak, while anxious negotiations took place between the White House in Washington and the Kremlin in Moscow.  In the end, Khrushchev backed down, removed the missiles from Cuba and the entire world breathed a heavy sigh of relief.  Even after that scare, the Cold War continued another 37 years until the fall of the Soviet Union.

6. Fateful Assassinations

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. at the March on Washington - I Have a Dream speech
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. at the March on Washington – I Have a Dream speech

Perhaps no other decade than the Sixties saw so many pivotal assassinations.  These included, but are not limited to: U.S. President John F. Kennedy in Dallas in 1963, Malcolm X in New York City in 1965, Che Guevara in Bolivia in 1967, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in Memphis in 1968, and U.S. Senator Robert F. Kennedy in Los Angeles in 1968.  And that short list does not even include the Prime Ministers of South Africa, the Congo, and Japan – also killed in the Sixties. The deaths of these influential leaders forever changed the course of politics, culture and the civil rights movement.  One can only imagine what our world would be like today if either Kennedy or King had survived. 

But perhaps, all those deaths toughened the Baby Boomer generation.  Did the ideals of JFK die with him?  Certainly not – as just one example, when Apollo 11 landed men on the Moon in 1969. Did the Civil Rights movement die with MLK?  Like Gandhi before him, King inspired a whole new generation of non-violent activists and his very name evokes a sense of reverence amongst minorities to this day.  In our current decade, such political assassinations are thankfully rare. Yet the impact and consequences of those fateful 1960s deaths are still felt today. We continue to tackle political, cultural, economic and racial polarization.

The Sixties was really like any other decade in our modern history. It was fraught with cultural changes, political turmoil, economic upheaval, new technologies, and yes, waves of unfortunate violence. Some 1960’s small rural towns, isolated from national or global issues, did have a sort of idealistic innocence to them.  But whether you are a Boomer or Millennial or Gen Z, compare the Sixties to the 1990’s, 2000’s or 2010’s. You will see a repeated pattern of struggle and change.  We managed to survive the Sixties without nuclear Armageddon and we will somehow survive the 2020’s as well.  It is, after all, how we overcome our struggles and evolve, that defines us as a planet – a generation – or an individual.

For more by historical writer Paul Andrews, click BOOKS.
LOST IN HISTORY
Home » Blog » Page 10

The Lost, Banned Books of the Bible

Biblical Scroll of a book of the Bible
Biblical Scroll of a book of the Bible

Most every Christian throughout the world is familiar with the English King James version of the Holy Bible. Most believe, or have been taught, that it contains the ONLY books of the Old and New Testament ever written. But in fact, it contains only the church–approved books by the Protestant, Catholic or Orthodox faiths. There are other banned books of the Bible, written in the early years of Christianity. They never made the cut for the New Testament by the Catholic Church, or subsequent Orthodox or Protestant religions. Few people today know they even exist.

First, let’s briefly look at the Old Testament differences based on religion. The word Bible, comes from the Greek biblia, which means “scroll.” After the death of Jesus of Nazareth, 46 books of the Hebrew Bible [or Tanakh] became known as the Old Testament. The writings of Jesus’ disciples became the New Testament [27 books]. The Protestant Bible contains 7 less books in their Old Testament, excluding Tobias, Judith, Baruch, Sirach, Wisdom, and 1 & 2 Maccabees. The Orthodox Bible contains 7 more books in their Old Testament compared to the Catholic, including Manaseh, 1 & 2 Esdras, 3 & 4 Maccabees, Odes, and Psalm 151.

The New Testaments books were likely written in Kione Greek in the first century AD. None of the original scrolls exist, so the exact timing of their creation or who exactly authored them, despite the Gospel names, are not known for absolute certainty. Any scroll remnants remaining today are written copies of the originals.

Christianity became the religion of the Roman Empire when Emperor Constantine converted in 313 AD. The list of books to be included in the canon of the Catholic Bible was started by the Council of Rome in 382 AD. It was a synod of bishops lead by Pope Damascus, under the blessing of then Emperor Theodosius.

The Bible was finalized after 15 years of intense discussion in 397 AD. They decided on the four Gospels we know today – Mark, Matthew, Luke and John, written in that order, roughly between 70 and 100 AD. It also included 23 other books, following Peter, Paul, John and other apostles as they spread Christianity across the Mediterranean and the Roman Empire.

Here are the top 8 Banned Books, excluded from the New Testament.

  1. THE INFANCY GOSPEL OF THOMAS – Believed to be written by Jesus’ brother in the second century, in the Syriac language. It relates the childhood of Jesus from age 5 to 12, not included in the other Gospels, including various early miracles he performed. The early church considered it spurious and heretical fiction.
  2. THE INFANCY GOSPEL OF JAMES – Written in Greek in the second century, it covers in greater detail the Immaculate Conception of Mary, through the Nativity in Bethlehem, and the visitation of the three Magi. It states Mary remained a virgin her entire life and depicts Joseph as an elderly widower with prior children.
  3. THE GNOSTIC GOSPEL OF THOMAS – Written in Coptic in the first or second century, and discovered in 1945. Believed to be written by the apostle Thomas, it is not a narrative like the other Gospels, but rather a collection of Jesus’ sayings, parables and dialogues. It makes no mention the crucifixion or resurrection.
  4. THE GOSPEL OF PETER – Supposedly written by Saint Peter in the second century, and discovered in 1886 in Egypt. It describes in greater detail the Passion of Jesus Christ, including Herod sentencing Jesus to crucifixion, not Pilate, and the subsequent resurrection. It was rejected by the 4th century church as apocryphal.
  5. THE GNOSTIC GOSPEL OF PHILIP – Written in the 3rd century, too late to be by the apostle Philip, and rediscovered in 1945. It relates a closer relationship between Jesus and disciple Mary Magdalene. The Gospel implies they may even have been married, depending on the translation. It was rejected by the early church for obvious reasons.
  6. THE GOSPEL OF MARY – Written in Coptic in the second century and rediscovered in 1896. Exactly which Mary wrote it is up for debate, with most scholars believing it was Mary Magdalene. It depicts, in greater detail, the events following Jesus’ resurrection. It was rejected by the early church as women were not allowed to be preachers.
  7. THE GNOSTIC GOSPEL OF JUDAS – Written in the second century, not by Judas but rather early Christians, about his relationship with Jesus. It states Jesus instructed Judas to betray him following the Last Supper. Why? In order for him to die for man’s sins. Other gnostic teachings did not match the canon of the 4 included Gospels.
  8. THE GOSPEL OF NICODEMUS – Supposedly written in Hebrew by the disciple of Jesus. It relates Jesus’ trial with Pontius Pilate in greater detail, as well as the subsequent resurrection. It names, for example, the two criminals executed with Jesus, Dismas & Gestas. It was deemed apocryphal by the 4th century church and not included.

Let’s take a brief look at the history of the Bible since the 4th century AD.

Example of a Biblical Scroll
Early cover of the King James Bible

The Great Schism of 1054 occurred when the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches officially separated. The Orthodox Church however, continued to use the same 27 books of the New Testament that the Catholic Bible does. In 1455 German Johannes Gutenberg invented a revolutionary new printing press with movable type. This allowed him to print over a hundred of his Latin Gutenberg Bibles, to be sold throughout all of Europe. Prior to that, Bibles were slowly and painstakingly hand written.

German Martin Luther initiated the Protestant Reformation in the year 1517. The Protestant religions that resulted continued to use the same 27 books of the New Testament that the Catholic Bible does. Though 7 Old Testament books were excluded from the Protestant Bible – Tobit, Judith, 1 & 2 Maccabees, Wisdom, Sirach, and Baruch. Protestant leaders did not include them as they did not follow theological doctrine, e.g. regarding the existence of purgatory or not.

The King James Bible was an English language version of the Bible commissioned by English King James I in 1604. It was to use ‘contemporary’ English, rather than Latin, which few could read, other than clergy. This is the Bible that most Christians have paper copies of in their home today. The Bible itself has actually been banned in some atheist, Communist (e.g. Soviet Union, North Korea) or Islamic nations (e.g. Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan) over the centuries.

In the 21st century, the Bible was digitized and is now easily available via the internet or Apps on most smart phones. So the “Lost” Banned Books of the Bible were never actually lost. The early Catholic church leaders purposely excluded them from the New Testament for various reasons in the 4th century, a decision that has lasted ever since.

For more by historical writer Paul Andrews, click BOOKS.
LOST IN HISTORY
Home » Blog » Page 10